-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can't find any configuration for OpenAI Embeddings #875
Comments
Hey Hasnain, thanks for reaching out! Have you tried the regular e5/large embeddings? These are significantly more performant in english. If you need multi-lingual embeddings, openai doesnt support those at the moment. In any case, we don't currently support openai embeddings in Marqo. Another option to get better performance would be to sign up for Marqtune so you can finetune your embeddings to improve them for your usecase. |
Thanks @tomhamer @wanliAlex for the suggestions. I am having multi-lingual document (German, Italian, English). I will checkout the custom embeddings section as well. One follow-up question related to If I add
But lets say The main problem in my case is that if I keep adding new fields for each different attribute then I will end up having around 2000 fields which is way too much and that's why I am looking for a solution to do the matching/fuzzy matching in the description. |
What do you mean by this line? OpenAI text-embedding-03-large is multi-lingual and for simple vector search, it is giving me better results if I compare with any other Open source model but I wanna do some more keyword search like filter_string. |
Hey, I am playing around with marqo, did multiple experiments and I am having a few questions.
hf/multilingual-e5-large](https://huggingface.co/intfloat/multilingual-e5-large
to generate embeddings and created an index and now search isn't working as expected. For example, if I type in a search query "bike" then the first 3-4 retrieved documents are not even related to bikes.This is how I am using marqo index;
And above both queries are not working as expected. Any help or guidance will be appreciated. Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: