You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
When there are many facet values (let's say tags) and you add a refinementList widget the result count for the facets is off. I first thought exhaustiveFacetsCount might be the way to go but this has been removed.
I also tried to limit the refinementList facet values but the count would be still wrong. Only when I reduced the indexed facet values to ~25 the count started to be correct again.
I've read that in instantsearch this there are a few ways to handle this:
exhaustiveFacetsCount config
maxValuesPerFacet config
A calculation/estimation (read somewhere in the docs the just multiply by 3 for the estimation)
Expected behavior
Either configurable exhaustiveFacetsCount or a better estimation of the count like.
Current behavior
Only a fraction of results is counted when there is an extensive list of facets
Environment (please complete the following information):
Meilisearch version: v1.5.1
instant-meilisearch version: ^0.14.0
instantsearch.js version: ^4.63.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
When there are many facet values (let's say tags) and you add a refinementList widget the result count for the facets is off. I first thought
exhaustiveFacetsCount
might be the way to go but this has been removed.I also tried to limit the refinementList facet values but the count would be still wrong. Only when I reduced the indexed facet values to ~25 the count started to be correct again.
I've read that in instantsearch this there are a few ways to handle this:
exhaustiveFacetsCount
configmaxValuesPerFacet
configExpected behavior
Either configurable
exhaustiveFacetsCount
or a better estimation of the count like.Current behavior
Only a fraction of results is counted when there is an extensive list of facets
Environment (please complete the following information):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: