Skip to content

Problem with protocol 224 GEO minim+ energy monitor #2363

Answered by zuckschwerdt
Tobiasonline asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

OK, of the four header bytes suspected to be magic numbers the last one is actually the packet length. 05 or 2a. The first three are still not clear but show some pattern, seen so far:

3f 06 29 05
fb 06 81 05

and

ea 01 35 2a
da c1 35 2a

I'll fix the decoder now.

Replies: 2 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@zuckschwerdt
Comment options

@Tobiasonline
Comment options

Answer selected by Tobiasonline
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants