Is there a plan to make Microsoft Graph objects standard and not require experimental features enablement?

[masonwolff]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am wondering if there is a plan to remove the need for the experimental features configuration that is required to access the "microsoftGraph" provider?

[dkershaw10]

Not sure if you are asking two questions here @masonwolff?

1. Remove the need to specify the experimental feature config to use the microsoftGraph provider?
2. Remove the need to even specify the provider or extension statement (extension to be added in the upcoming v0.29 Bicep release - see [Bicep Extensibility] Deprecating the term provider in favor of extension Azure/bicep#14374)?

For 1: yes, we plan to remove this requirement, once the Bicep "extensibility" feature comes out of preview.
For 2: we have discussed whether this statement is required or not, if the resource declarations already have the Microsoft.Graph namespace. I think this one is still TBD, and the provider/extension statement is still required for now.

[dkershaw10]

@masonwolff Have I answered your question? If so, please go ahead and close this issue.