You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please extend the FAQ. It is very small-ish right now.
I would like to know whether C:\usr\ can work for msys2.
msys2 installer is a bit picky e. g. warning about removing it again
leading to the directory being removed. But I don't uninstall via
the uninstaller once I have a Linux-like environment - my package
manager handles that anyway.
Is it possible to install msys2 via a /usr/ prefix? I'd like to simulate
the FHS as much as possible on windows.
This is probably easy to answer for you guys but I would just like
to see such simple confirmation for windows. I am now reading
up on cl.exe actually because I don't understand pacman and
I want to learn. I compile on Linux fine, but for learning how
to compile on windows pacman is actually not helping me at
all. So I want the "raw" way. I hope you guys can extend the
FAQ in general, right now it is super short. Or perhaps it needs
a link to the "real" FAQ if that is stored elsewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey there msys2 devs,
Please extend the FAQ. It is very small-ish right now.
I would like to know whether C:\usr\ can work for msys2.
msys2 installer is a bit picky e. g. warning about removing it again
leading to the directory being removed. But I don't uninstall via
the uninstaller once I have a Linux-like environment - my package
manager handles that anyway.
Is it possible to install msys2 via a /usr/ prefix? I'd like to simulate
the FHS as much as possible on windows.
This is probably easy to answer for you guys but I would just like
to see such simple confirmation for windows. I am now reading
up on cl.exe actually because I don't understand pacman and
I want to learn. I compile on Linux fine, but for learning how
to compile on windows pacman is actually not helping me at
all. So I want the "raw" way. I hope you guys can extend the
FAQ in general, right now it is super short. Or perhaps it needs
a link to the "real" FAQ if that is stored elsewhere.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: