You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think so, the IETF proposal seems more limited than multihash (not clear if it supports 64 algorithms (it reserves 6 bits for that) or 32 as it says). It doesn't specify the size making binary interpretation of truncated hashes more problematic than with multihash too.
Conversion between the two formats should be very easy though.
I just noticed that this RFC is linked from the README so @jbenet knew about it 3 years ago when he added that line at least.
Just wondering if the devs here have seen the work at the IETF:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920
Could the two efforts be compatible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: