Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Design improvments for topic pages/category pages #8445

Open
gbp opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Design improvments for topic pages/category pages #8445

gbp opened this issue Nov 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
f:topic-pages improvement Improves existing functionality (UI tweaks, refactoring, performance, etc) t:design x:uk

Comments

@gbp
Copy link
Member

gbp commented Nov 4, 2024

On WDTK, we have increased the number of topic pages to a point where the index view is getting quite long and needs some better UI design.

Maybe we could collapse the long lists and have an option to expand to show everything. See current index view:
image


On the individual topic page which uses the list view (where @category is set), it would also be good to improve UI.

This view is also used for the main search result list so we will need to be mindful of changes that work for both or separate the view.

Given the topic page is already filtered and showing a collection of results, my guess would be the search form won't be used as much as the main view. So maybe we could move the search form into the sidebar or hide it completely until it is revealed. See current list view:

image

Aside: If the "Follow" and "RSS" feed_link button styling could be fixed, that would be amazing.

@gbp gbp added x:uk t:design improvement Improves existing functionality (UI tweaks, refactoring, performance, etc) f:topic-pages labels Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
f:topic-pages improvement Improves existing functionality (UI tweaks, refactoring, performance, etc) t:design x:uk
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants