Replies: 1 comment
-
I would love something like Act for Bitbucket too! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I’ve got an organization that I personally want to use GitHub (which would make this project useful to my day-to-day), but the org is pretty adamant about staying with Bitbucket.
I’m wondering if you guys think the model of computation is suitable to accept Bitbucket-pipelines.yml file as an optional input, or perhaps a “run-for-pipelines” mode. I know that Bitbuckets’ pipelines has its own containers it can plug-in which may or may not clash with concepts already supported by GitHub actions…
I’m aware this functionality probably doesn’t exist, but if it’s a simple enough refactor to support it I’d be happy to help.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions