Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC 6979 #862

Open
sebastiantf opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

RFC 6979 #862

sebastiantf opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@sebastiantf
Copy link

sebastiantf commented Nov 7, 2024

Does this implement RFC 6979? Was using aws-kms-ethers-signer and it seems like it's not?

Was getting different signatures each time. Ethers.js looks like it does (use noble-secp256k1 which) use RFC 6979. So getting same signature

@odanado
Copy link
Owner

odanado commented Nov 7, 2024

The signature is not definitive not because of a problem with aws-kms-ethers-signer but because AWS KMS does not implement RFC 6979.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants