We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does this implement RFC 6979? Was using aws-kms-ethers-signer and it seems like it's not?
aws-kms-ethers-signer
Was getting different signatures each time. Ethers.js looks like it does (use noble-secp256k1 which) use RFC 6979. So getting same signature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The signature is not definitive not because of a problem with aws-kms-ethers-signer but because AWS KMS does not implement RFC 6979.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Does this implement RFC 6979? Was using
aws-kms-ethers-signer
and it seems like it's not?Was getting different signatures each time. Ethers.js looks like it does (use noble-secp256k1 which) use RFC 6979. So getting same signature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: