We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pdf中的章节实际上反映了文章的层级关系,现在貌似解析出来的结果都是相同层级的,能否根据章节标号等特征,确定下标题的层级? Uploading RAG评估-A unified evaluation.pdf…
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
论文见:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12941
Sorry, something went wrong.
omni-parse这个工具的解析结果中就会分为多个层级,https://github.com/adithya-s-k/omniparse
标题分级需要考虑到所有样例的普适性,并不是所有文档都存在章节标号,因此我们预计会采用标题行高聚类的方案进行分级,但优先级较低,可能会放到下下个版本
标题分级需要考虑到所有样例的普适性,并不是所有文档都存在章节标号,因此我们预计会采用标题行高聚类的方案进行分级,但优先级较低,可能会放到下下个版本 好的
No branches or pull requests
pdf中的章节实际上反映了文章的层级关系,现在貌似解析出来的结果都是相同层级的,能否根据章节标号等特征,确定下标题的层级?
Uploading RAG评估-A unified evaluation.pdf…
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: