Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

InstaSlice CR namespace #48

Open
asm582 opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

InstaSlice CR namespace #48

asm582 opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@asm582
Copy link
Contributor

asm582 commented Sep 4, 2024

We need to agree on the InstaSlice CR namespace and add the correct RBACs to the InstaSlice CR hosting namespace, it has MIG slice placement information which apart from role admin, a regular user should not have access.

@asm582
Copy link
Contributor Author

asm582 commented Sep 4, 2024

@harche @empovit any thoughts?

@harche
Copy link
Contributor

harche commented Sep 4, 2024

Agree.

@empovit
Copy link
Contributor

empovit commented Sep 5, 2024

As the operator is part of the OpenShift org, I think we could use something like openshift-accelerator-slicer by default, similarly to openshift-nfd or openshift-kmm.

Also, IMO it should be customizable (including RBAC), to allow deployment into any namespace.

@empovit empovit self-assigned this Sep 5, 2024
@asm582 asm582 added v0.1 and removed v0.1 labels Sep 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants