Does Nebari require node group names to be "general", "user", and "worker"?

[Adam-D-Lewis]

Does Nebari require node group names to be "general", "user", and "worker" or do we support arbitrary node group names? Stated differently, does a deployment have to have a "general", and "user" node group? I think I've heard of some users renaming some node groups in the past. I'm considering enforcing the "general", "user", "worker" node group names a bit in a PR I'm working on and wondering how big of an issue it'll be.

BTW, I don't have an issue with continuing to support additional arbitrary node group names beyond "general", "user", and "worker". My question is mostly around guaranteeing "general", "user", and "worker" node group names exist.

I did see this guide on pre-existing deployments says those should be the node group names - https://www.nebari.dev/docs/how-tos/nebari-kubernetes#creating-node-groups