Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify Optimism naming #12192

Open
mattsse opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Unify Optimism naming #12192

mattsse opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
C-enhancement New feature or request D-good-first-issue Nice and easy! A great choice to get started

Comments

@mattsse
Copy link
Collaborator

mattsse commented Oct 30, 2024

Describe the feature

op-alloy settled on Op prefix, our crates still use Optimism

we should rename our types here to Op as well.

this should happen type by type, e.g: OptimismPayloadBuilderAttributes -> OpPayloadBuilderAttributes

Additional context

No response

@mattsse mattsse added C-enhancement New feature or request S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled D-good-first-issue Nice and easy! A great choice to get started and removed S-needs-triage This issue needs to be labelled labels Oct 30, 2024
@stevencartavia
Copy link
Contributor

🙋🏽‍♂️

@mattsse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattsse commented Oct 30, 2024

cool, let's wait until this pr is merged:

#11887

@mattsse
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mattsse commented Oct 30, 2024

@stevencartavia if you want, you can also look into alloy-rs/op-alloy#204

@stevencartavia
Copy link
Contributor

@stevencartavia if you want, you can also look into alloy-rs/op-alloy#204

sure! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-enhancement New feature or request D-good-first-issue Nice and easy! A great choice to get started
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants