Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to "expect all UTXO data to be filled in" for v2 payjoin and NOT v1 #359

Open
DanGould opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@DanGould
Copy link
Contributor

DanGould commented Sep 26, 2024

The version 1 spec requied UTXO data to be cleared on the transport message layer instead of by the sender's typestate machine. Can we accomodate this, or does it make more sense to leave it completely backwards compatible with the v1 spec.

I've left a detailed fix proposal in the bips repo, which seems to have consensus, but the BIP 78 author's time is limited and it would be difficult to deploy the change in the production payjoin v1 implementations

@DanGould DanGould added this to the Payjoin V2 beta milestone Sep 26, 2024
@DanGould DanGould changed the title Is it possible to "expectsall UTXO data to be filled in" Is it possible to "expect all UTXO data to be filled in" Sep 26, 2024
@DanGould DanGould changed the title Is it possible to "expect all UTXO data to be filled in" Is it possible to "expect all UTXO data to be filled in" for v2 payjoin and NOT v1 Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant