-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 447
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multilingual Metadata in Crossref #9126
Comments
@bozana, could you have a look at this when you're available? Thanks! |
I don't see a reason this wouldn't be appropriate to OPS as well. In the Sprint there was also interest in possible backporting to 3.3. Should I write something up for 3.3? |
@ctgraham, great! Any contribution is very welcome! 🙏 |
pkp/pkp-lib#9126 crossref submodule update ##bozana/9126-3_4_0##
this is huge, many thanks for making it happen! it has the potential to unleash a ton of multilingual metadata that were never really exposed before (because of either #7272 or #699). about multilingual metadata of monolingual content, last time I've checked with CrossRef, they've recommended "adding it [the language attribute] to both the journal-level and journal-article-level metadata", e.g.:
https://community.crossref.org/t/multi-language-support/3054/12 could you confirm if the language attribute is always set, even in the case of a single language? maybe it's also a good time to reconsider the implications of #7569, to avoid problems downstream during deposit and indexing. as an editor/admin, I'd appreciate the option to follow CrossRef's recommended practices more strictly (i.e., adopting a language-agnostic journal title), without imposing the choice. here are a couple of other related issues: |
Hi, @fgnievinski . In pkp/crossref-ojs#38, the Note that Crossref does not (as of schema 5.3.1) support the |
pkp/pkp-lib#9126: backport for multilingual crossref metadata
Regarding OPS: |
pkp/pkp-lib#9126 crossref submodule update ##bozana/9126-3_4_0##
Describe the bug
PKP Sprint Copenhagen. Metadata exported to Crossref is currently mono-lingual (primary locale). Journals are collecting multilingual metadata for articles. Crossref can index this either as supplementary metadata (when there is multilingual metadata for a monolingual article), or as independent DOIs (for articles which have been translated). This facilitates discovery in the user’s language.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
What application are you using?
OJS 3.3, 3.4
Additional information
Shayn Smulyan from Crossref writes:
the format you used would be fine for submitting multiple abstracts in multiple languages.
But, as far as the titles go, there are two options.
If the article you're registering is a translation of another article, you should use the <original_language_title> tag. In context that looks like this:
In this case, as well, we'd strongly recommend adding an isTranslationOf intra-work relationship to connecting to the DOI of the original.
If the article is not a translation, but you simply want the metadata expressed in multiple languages, you should not use
<original_language_title>
but instead add multiple<titles>
sections, one for each language. The language attribute within the<journal_article>
tag should reflect the language of the full text content.So that would look like like this
Sprint contributors to this work include:
PRs:
OJS
OPS
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: