Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace hbbft-specific parity toml config parameters with data supplied by contracts #48

Open
dforsten opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Replace hbbft-specific parity toml config parameters with data supplied by contracts #48

dforsten opened this issue Nov 13, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
@dforsten

Comments

@dforsten
Copy link

All information to start validators is now available through contracts - eliminate the temporary "hbbft" parameters from the parity toml config parser.

Adapt the hbbft config generator for the change, make it generate the necessary data to initialize the hbbft contracts with an arbitrary number of initial validators.
@dforsten dforsten self-assigned this Nov 13, 2019
@dforsten dforsten changed the title Eliminate hbbft-specific parameters from the parity toml config file Replace hbbft-specific parity toml config parameters with parameters supplied by contracts Nov 13, 2019
@dforsten dforsten changed the title Replace hbbft-specific parity toml config parameters with parameters supplied by contracts Replace hbbft-specific parity toml config parameters with data supplied by contracts Nov 13, 2019
SurfingNerd added a commit to SurfingNerd/posdao-contracts that referenced this issue Apr 15, 2021
@SurfingNerd
Merge pull request poanetwork#48 from SurfingNerd/reward
6b21638 
Integrated pool based reward logic
@SurfingNerd
Copy link

that link on github is a missinterpretation made by github.
It's connected to this pull request: DMDcoin/diamond-contracts-core#48

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dforsten dforsten

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dforsten @SurfingNerd