Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A better "extend" function. Any comments ? #92

Open
tvsudhir opened this issue Jan 26, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

A better "extend" function. Any comments ? #92

tvsudhir opened this issue Jan 26, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@tvsudhir
Copy link

I was trying to rewrite the "extend" function by introducing more combinators and make it look better. Please do comment on this.

// This function should be renamed ... Any suggestions ??
function objMapWith( fn ) {
    return function ( obj ) {
        Object.keys( obj ).forEach( function (key) {
            fn(key, obj[key]);
        });
    };
}

// This is not pure function but might be the required one.
// Comments ?? 
function addPropTo( obj ) {
    return function (key, val) {
        return obj[key] = val;
    }
}

extend = variadic( function (consumer, providers) {
    mapWith( objMapWith( addPropTo( consumer )))( providers );

    return consumer;
});
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant