You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Dear:
I have read the paper that you published in arxiv (https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03930).
As descripted above, I am confused that what's the difference between Reverb and Reverb Research. Why Reverb is much better than Reverb Research?
This repo is Reverb Research, not Reverb right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for reading our paper! I can absolutely provide some clarity:
Both Reverb and Reverb Research at the core are the same model -- the main difference in performance is the underlying inference code that runs the model. You're correct this repo houses the underlying code used to run and evaluate Reverb Research. For the inference code we use to get the results in Reverb, checkout our other opensource repo https://github.com/revdotcom/reverb-self-hosted!
Hi Dear:
I have read the paper that you published in arxiv (https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03930).
As descripted above, I am confused that what's the difference between
Reverb
andReverb Research
. WhyReverb
is much better thanReverb Research
?This repo is
Reverb Research
, notReverb
right?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: