-
QR code submitted for printing (markers submitted for printing)
-
The Group Meeting with me (this is yes or no and will be counted from the first request of meetings - not the reminder to have a meeting with me)
-
Set of videos and photos documenting the experience and all working components
-
The live website at gh - pages branch AND QR code to custom Group landing page and AR activation
-
Instructions, introduction, theme, story etc. as documentation on landing webpage
-
One of the following: - List of GPS coords/locations - List of custom markers, printed - List of facial features tracked, or points used for AR content
-
a clean and organized repo
-
GitHub commits of content from each group member
-
PDF file of Group Project information - more comprehensive than the website landing page including: - Group members and contribution - Think of this PDF document as the detailed and comprehensive README.md and STATEMENT.md files combined - Specific customization of AR content submitted - is this in the interaction code? - is this in the concept? - is this in the models? - is this in the experience? - what is the expected experience: what should we see and where (if you have treasure/riddle content you may leave this out until after we test) - other ?
-
Also to be evaluated is the final project experience and functionality - 3 marks for technical code: complexity, interaction, difficulty - 3 marks for aesthetic experience: design, cohesiveness, affect