You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi @rosinality , thank you for your great contribution, the result is amazing, but the huge input/output channels(1024, 512, etc) make the convolution heavy and slow, how could we implement lightweight convolutions to slim the model? thank you.
Btw, there are some mobile/lightweight open sources, like MobileStyleGAN, anycost-gan, etc, but almost all these approaches are trying to decrease the channels, but unfortunately, this will also decrease the image quality, I just wonder if we could make a super lightweight convolution without decreasing the channels but still maintain similar results with StyleGAN2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You can try depthwise convolutions, but generally depthwise convolution requires even more channels than standard convolutions.
I think you can try approaches like FastGAN.
Thank you for your kind help, yes, depthwise separable convolution maybe need even more channels, and it is difficult to replace ModulatedConv2d. Let me try FastGAN
hi @rosinality , thank you for your great contribution, the result is amazing, but the huge input/output channels(1024, 512, etc) make the convolution heavy and slow, how could we implement lightweight convolutions to slim the model? thank you.
Btw, there are some mobile/lightweight open sources, like MobileStyleGAN, anycost-gan, etc, but almost all these approaches are trying to decrease the channels, but unfortunately, this will also decrease the image quality, I just wonder if we could make a super lightweight convolution without decreasing the channels but still maintain similar results with StyleGAN2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: