Catch-all domains: only auto-create aliases with a specific prefix #588
fazy
started this conversation in
Feature Requests
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@fazy, I have not personally experienced this problem (and am not sure how common it is). Here are three potential workarounds that could address the issue described:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
This has been now been supported as you can now define the regular expression for auto-create aliases for a custom domain :). This feature was released yesterday so it's still beta :). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Once enough spammers get hold of a domain, it will start to receive email addressed to many guessed names such as
jon@example.com
,jane@example.com
or evenfkdlfakjd@example.com
. This makes it unusable with SimpleLogin - if we have to keep suppressing them, it's no better than a Gmail filter.Please make it possible to only accept email on the catch-all domain when the receiver (envelope) email address has a specific, configurable prefix.
Examples:
+
trick on her domain, so she could add a rule to allow only only emails starting withalice+
.bob.<anything>.12345@example.com
(where 12345 is a random number), so he could add a rule to only allow emails starting withbob.
.charlie-something@example.com
and set a prefix ofcharlie-
.The point is, a prefix rule could be fairly simple and cover many use cases. Although a full pattern matching or regex would be fine too.
Is it foolproof?
Of course not, but after 20 years and about 2000 email addresses, I have never seen spammers guessing a prefix like this. Especially if you use a constant but obscure prefix. It would cut down 99.9% of my spam.
Could directories be used?
Maybe, if it gets implemented (#415), but directories only use
/
,#
and+
as the separator which gives rise to two problems:.
or-
, then they cannot migrate an existing domain.Directories could solve this use case if:
AND
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions