Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remote data registrations #226

Closed
woutermont opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Remote data registrations #226

woutermont opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@woutermont
Copy link
Contributor

While neither the specification nor the applicaiton primer mention them anymore, since they have been removed by #175, RemoteDataRegistrations are still present in the latest full primer draft (https://solid.github.io/data-interoperability-panel/primer/). Is this just waiting for the next draft to be published?

@elf-pavlik elf-pavlik self-assigned this Jan 25, 2022
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/solid/data-interoperability-panel#initiatives-in-process

Doesn't like that primer anymore. I'll remove it from the repo all together not to cause confusion!

We are going to have dedicated primers for Applications and Authorization Agents since those two audiences differ a lot.

@woutermont
Copy link
Contributor Author

Discussed in panel meeting of 2022-01-25: videos's could be moved to YouTube, where bubble comments can be used to annotate specific moments of divergence from newer drafts.

@TallTed
Copy link
Contributor

TallTed commented Jan 27, 2022

videos's could be moved to YouTube, where bubble comments can be used to annotate specific moments of divergence from newer drafts.

Such "inline" notations on videos may be a nice idea in the abstract, but I wonder whether dependency on a feature of a third party site is appropriate for this.

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

We are going to remove links to the old videos altogether #296 and record new videos #298

@TallTed
Copy link
Contributor

TallTed commented Feb 27, 2023

We are going to remove links to the old videos altogether #296 and record new videos #298

I am in favor of new recordings, but I strongly advise against entirely removing the old videos. It is important to be able to review history. Certainly, make it plain that "these n videos were recorded in YYYY–YYYY, and are preserved here for historical perspective" along with "these m videos were recorded in 2023, and reflect current status and plans as of MMM".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants