Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove public inboxes #280

Closed
elf-pavlik opened this issue Oct 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #301
Closed

Remove public inboxes #280

elf-pavlik opened this issue Oct 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #301
Assignees

Comments

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

Related issue: solid/specification#464

Currently, spec suggest two inboxes in https://solid.github.io/data-interoperability-panel/specification/#social-agents

  ######## Inboxes ########
  interop:hasInbox alice-inbox:general ;
  interop:hasAccessInbox alice-inbox:access .

Later on, Access Inbox is being used in https://solid.github.io/data-interoperability-panel/specification/#access-receipt

I think we should remove the use of public inboxes altogether. Instead, iterate on SAI Invitations. I have some thoughts captured in Social Agent Invitation and Identity Verification. I believe that we can leverage a pre-established communication channel between Social Agents to establish initial pair of Social Agent Registrations. Removing the need for any public inboxes altogether.

This will auto fix #227 😉

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member Author

#295 notes:

  • @elf-pavlik: I will be working as part of the project with NLnet on bootstrapping social graph and re-iteration of invitations. This will result in establishing reciprocal social agent registrations.
  • @justinwb: We had them as a workaround for the lack of notifications, in favor of removing them and switching to notifications

@elf-pavlik elf-pavlik self-assigned this Feb 27, 2023
elf-pavlik added a commit to elf-pavlik/data-interoperability-panel that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant