Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] cloze overlapping #284

Closed
mkschulze opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 10 comments
Closed

[FEAT] cloze overlapping #284

mkschulze opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 10 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mkschulze
Copy link

mkschulze commented Aug 31, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When reviewing a multiple cloze card, it would be great to have the option to use a cloze overlapping, so all ==highlights== get hidden away.

Describe the solution you'd like
Having this card here:

#cloze<br>
Condition 1: ==explanation for 1==<br>
Condition 2: ==explanation for 2==<br>
Condition 3: ==explanation for 3==<br>
Condition 4: ==explanation for 4==<br>

Bildschirmfoto 2021-08-30 um 21 34 25

It would be great to have all explanations hidden away.

Additional context
Feature as an alternative to a fixed chain repetition.

@mkschulze mkschulze added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 31, 2021
@mkschulze
Copy link
Author

how's life coming along @st3v3nmw? :)

I just aquired 1.100 flashcards, that want to get ported to obsidian-spaced-repitition and would be looking forward to using cloze overlapping. 😇🙏

@ucelote-de-mar
Copy link

This would be awesome, esp. if this can be done linewise like

Nouns are words for people, animals, places, or things.

So I know beforehand I have to complete 4 items.

@mkschulze
Copy link
Author

Still in favour :)

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label May 7, 2023
@mkschulze
Copy link
Author

any news about this maybe?

@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Jun 26, 2024

Hi @MotaOcimar, I'm looking at all the issues you referenced in your PR #943 to gain an understanding as part of reviewing your great contribution.

I believe that the example within this issue would be satisfied with:

Condition 1: ==explanation for 1==[^1]<br>
Condition 2: ==explanation for 2==[^1]<br>
Condition 3: ==explanation for 3==[^1]<br>
Condition 4: ==explanation for 4==[^1]<br>

I.e. specifying the same sequence number 1 in each deletion. Is that correct?

Hi @mkschulze for clarity, I'm wondering why you use the term "overlapping" in your description. Perhaps I have missed something, but can't see anything overlapping.

@mkschulze
Copy link
Author

@ronzulu I think what I was looking for is just having multiple ==HIGLIGHTS== hidden by the cloze instruction. So that it "overlaps" or covers all such instructions on the card. Maybe not the perfect word for it.

@ronzulu
Copy link
Collaborator

ronzulu commented Jun 27, 2024

Hi @mkschulze thanks for the clarification.

@MotaOcimar
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ronzulu!

Thank you for taking a look at the issues related to Clozes!

Regarding the solution for this issue, I had the same understanding as you. Marking all clozes with the sequence number 1 seems satisfactory, and there would be no need to use the "overlapping" functionality.

Also, thank you @mkschulze for staying active here for clarifications!

Best,
Ocimar

@st3v3nmw
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

I've just made a release v1.13.0 that ships with custom cloze patterns 🥳 all thanks to #943. The updated documentation is live here.

I've tested the release but not as extensively as I normally would. Perhaps we need a beta version of the plugin? That being said, I'm on standby to fix bugs ASAP. Just give me a shout.

Cheers.

@mkschulze
Copy link
Author

Interesting, will check it out. Thx! For now I guess we can cloze here! :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants