We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I am reading the code in generate_instruction.py. If you see the doc of Google's rouge_scorer, the input order of def _score_lcs(target_tokens, prediction_tokens): is target_tokens in the first. at https://github.com/google-research/google-research/blob/master/rouge/rouge_scorer.py#L186
generate_instruction.py
def _score_lcs(target_tokens, prediction_tokens):
In our case, should we take new instructions as the target_tokens? It seems unnatural. https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca/blob/main/generate_instruction.py#L189
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I am reading the code in
generate_instruction.py
.If you see the doc of Google's rouge_scorer, the input order of
def _score_lcs(target_tokens, prediction_tokens):
is target_tokens in the first.at https://github.com/google-research/google-research/blob/master/rouge/rouge_scorer.py#L186
In our case, should we take new instructions as the target_tokens? It seems unnatural.
https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca/blob/main/generate_instruction.py#L189
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: