Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Startup performance #217

Open
splitice opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Startup performance #217

splitice opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@thatmattlove
Labels
feature New feature or request needs-info Issue lacks appropriate detail or requires additional information

Comments

@splitice
Copy link

Feature Description

Hyperglass is notoriously slow to start when running in containerised applications where the build cache can not be used.

Environment & Use Case

Running hyperglass in a container in a kubernetes clustrer for our free third party powered looking glass (https://hyperglass.x4b.net/)

Additional Context

  • What I would like to see is something that allows for the removal of configuration from the static build so that the heavy work can be pre-computed.
  • Or changes made that enables a faster (more reasonable) build.

Currently a pod start takes 40 CPU minutes....
@splitice splitice added the feature New feature or request label Jan 17, 2023
@thatmattlove
Copy link
Owner

Hello, I'm curious if this is any different in v2.0.0, which is containerized by default. It may not be, but I'd still like to know.

@thatmattlove thatmattlove added the needs-info Issue lacks appropriate detail or requires additional information label May 27, 2024
@thatmattlove thatmattlove self-assigned this May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@thatmattlove thatmattlove

Labels
feature New feature or request needs-info Issue lacks appropriate detail or requires additional information
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@splitice @thatmattlove