You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Compared to the 256px tiles I'm seeing many more topology errors and dropped polygons in the 512px tiles. I think this is because after trying to make a polygon "whole" a few times, if we still fail we drop the feature. We need to do a better job to keep the features.
Compared to the 256px tiles I'm seeing many more topology errors and dropped polygons in the 512px tiles. I think this is because after trying to make a polygon "whole" a few times, if we still fail we drop the feature. We need to do a better job to keep the features.
For example, northern California:
http://tangrams.github.io/walkabout-style/#8/40.815/-124.094
512px tiles miss the wilderness areas, but 256px tiles include them:
At zoom 10 around Eureka, California:
http://tangrams.github.io/walkabout-style/#10/40.7353/-123.9306
512px tiles miss the land areas, but 256px tiles include them:
At zoom 9 around San Francisco, California:
http://tangrams.github.io/walkabout-style/#9/37.3865/-121.5486
512px tiles miss the land areas, but 256px tiles include them:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: