-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reactor is not RefUnwindSafe #285
Comments
Thanks for the report! I think though that since aribtrary trait objects are contained, I'm not sure this can be unwind safe? Could you also elaborate a bit on why you'd like the reactor to be unwind safe? |
Chain of consequences here are. Need to dispatch futures from an interpreter -> Nothing I can't work around locally but if it can be fixed upstream then that is obviously preferably (since I think the types here should all be |
Ok thanks for the explanation! My point here though is that the reactor isn't unwind safe as it contains arbitrary trait objects, so I don't actually think we can fix this at the |
Ah, didn't get that |
Oh sorry I thought this was |
Specifically this is because of the use of a
UnsafeCell
inside a long list of types so I am not sure which part exactly needs to implement this (guessing it is theQueue
that would assert that it is safe?).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: