Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move tomarrell/lbadd to own organization #28

Open
tsatke opened this issue Jan 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

move tomarrell/lbadd to own organization #28

tsatke opened this issue Jan 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
feature New feature or enhancement help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Milestone

Comments

@tsatke
Copy link
Contributor

tsatke commented Jan 13, 2020

The point in time to do this is NOT NOW, however, we should maybe think about this at some point.

Besides the core lbadd, there will be static analysis tools (at least for the parser) that help developers develop better and more easily.
Other than analysis tools, there might be custom written code generator tools at some point, as well as a documentation homepage.
Maybe we even want to outsource certain components instead of having everything in one big repo. This would also allow other developers to re-use components that we built (like uber does with its libraries, we could outsource the parser, so that other projects have a working SQL parser (we keep the IR)).

Before doing this, we should build a sensible structure that works for us.

@tsatke tsatke added needs triage This needs to be investigated or validated question Further information is requested labels Jan 13, 2020
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 13, 2020
@tsatke tsatke changed the title move timarrell/lbadd to own organization move tomarrell/lbadd to own organization Jan 13, 2020
@tsatke tsatke added this to the v0.0.1 milestone Feb 20, 2020
@tsatke
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsatke commented May 19, 2020

The biggest upside to this would be, that we can define more people that can administrate the repository and its members, as well as CI tools such as fuzzit.dev, without impacting Tom's private account. If this project gains more traction and more developers, this will definitely be neccessary.

@tsatke tsatke added feature New feature or enhancement help wanted Extra attention is needed and removed needs triage This needs to be investigated or validated labels May 19, 2020
@tsatke
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsatke commented May 19, 2020

FYI and ping @tomarrell

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature New feature or enhancement help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant