You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fantastic implementation of paper, although they have one more method of fine-tuning called as 'fragment growing', where if you give one fragment as SMILE, it will generate SMILES around that fragment. Is there any direction that you can point me to?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, Fragment Growing, in the paper, is implemented in code. For example, if you want to get new 100 molecules grew from benzamidine c1c(C(=N)N)cccc1, call lstm_chem.generator.sample(num=100, start='Gc1c(C(=N)N)cccc1').
However, be careful, this benzamidine SMILES sequence is not canonical. The SMILES is changed to elongate the molecule in a specific direction. That is, N=C(N)c1ccccc1 is canonical. N=C(N)c1ccccc1CCC is valid, but that is wrong direction. So I changed SMILES to valid and correct direction. (e.g. c1c(C(=N)N)cccc1CCC)
Fantastic implementation of paper, although they have one more method of fine-tuning called as 'fragment growing', where if you give one fragment as SMILE, it will generate SMILES around that fragment. Is there any direction that you can point me to?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: