You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Around https://ucsc-gi.slack.com/archives/CJ2EHEH1A/p1721346811431889 Jordan notes that he has some nanopore reads that acquire long softclips when they are surjected. We should see if the graph alignments they started with have something wrong with them to cause this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
adamnovak
changed the title
Investigate if graph alignments of nanoport reads that get long softclips at surjection are correct
Investigate if graph alignments of nanopore reads that get long softclips at surjection are correct
Jul 29, 2024
@jeizenga I think you might have resolved this question of nanopore read softclips at surjection. Do you think we can close this? Or is there a list of reads you still want someone to investigate at the mapping stage?
I think we understand what they are now, but I'm not sure we've fully resolved how we want to handle them. The question is how much work to put into realigning to paralogous sequences on the reference.
Around https://ucsc-gi.slack.com/archives/CJ2EHEH1A/p1721346811431889 Jordan notes that he has some nanopore reads that acquire long softclips when they are surjected. We should see if the graph alignments they started with have something wrong with them to cause this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: