Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

None class #56

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

None class #56

merged 47 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

scottperkins
Copy link
Member

Fixes # .
Addressing Issue #17 : Adding UQ via an auxiliary class which is defined by the complement in parameter space of the simulation samples.

Description of the Change

Introduce new template class (additiveUQ) and child class (NoneClassUQ) which represent a broad range of UQ methods which modify the (un-normalized) classification probabilities, population model, and inference data, and modifies the output in some way to address UQ. The NoneClassUQ class is a specific kind of method, where the None class is defined as the negative space in parameter space, left behind by low simulation fidelity. With the additional class, I must add a additiveUQ object as an argument to classify, and integrate it after the original classification has taken place.

In addition to the source code, there will be accompanying tests.

Checklist

Please check all that apply to your proposed changes

  • Added package dependency
  • Added data
  • Documentation change
  • code change

Additional context

@astrophpeter
Copy link
Member

Can you try and finish this off @zofiakaczmarek if you have the bandwidth please?

zofiakaczmarek and others added 21 commits September 17, 2024 19:15
The None class KDE test was failing as the fixed large bandwidth was causing the underestimation of density at the center. This is now fixed and the test is running with default scipy bandwidth
Added optional plotting with the None class UQ to plot_rel_prob_surfaces(). Some tweaks to NoneClassUQ
@zofiakaczmarek zofiakaczmarek marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 15:49
@astrophpeter astrophpeter merged commit 879b770 into main Sep 30, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants