[IBCDPE-769] Adds gene_info Expectation Suite

[BWMac]

Description:

This PR implements a GX expectation suite for the gene_info dataset.

The expectations chosen and limit values for the expectations (where applicable) come from the rules defined in the R scripts here, with a few exceptions.

1. total_nominations was expected to not be null according to the rules in the R script, but when I checked with expect_column_values_to_not_be_null this was not the case ~97.5% of the time so I left that expectation off.
2. Fields such as name, summary, and hgnc_symbol were also expected to not be null, but I found that they were to varying degrees. For these fields I introduced the mostly keyword which sets a percentage threshold for the expectation passing rather than the expectation failing if even one record does not satisfy it. The mostly keyword will be used in future work to add "warning" functionality to our data validation.
3. In the case of the target_nominations field, there were approximately 1.2% of the nested values which did not meet my JSON schema expectation (based on the rules here). This is caused by a combination of the data_used_to_support_target_selection, predicted_therapeutic_direction, and target_choice_justification fields containing invalid unicode characters, and null values in the data_synapseid and validation_study_details. So I set the mostly value for this expectation to 0.98.

Please let me know if there are any questions, suggestions for adjustments to expectations used/expectation configurations, or if any further discussion is needed with regards to decisions I have made here. This is by far the most complex GX suite we have implemented.

Notes:

• A sample HTML report for this expectation suite can be found here.
• Due to the complexity of this GX validation, the overall time of ADT data processing has increased: Elapsed time: 00:10:43 for gene_info dataset.

[thomasyu888]

🔥 LGTM! I'll leave it to the Agora team to provide feedback on the expectations themselves!

[jaclynbeck-sage]

Looks good, just had a few questions before approving.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[jaclynbeck-sage]

Looks good!

[JessterB]

lgtm, thanks!