-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds feature to use ULID in tests #444
Open
HolyKingCrusader
wants to merge
4
commits into
ThreeDotsLabs:master
Choose a base branch
from
HolyKingCrusader:Feature-to-use-ULID
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b12971
Adds feature to use ULID instead of UUID in topic name and consumer g…
HolyKingCrusader 640974c
split ULID id generation into a seperate function
HolyKingCrusader 94113fa
changed func name
HolyKingCrusader 247f2e9
added a field for setting function used in ID generation
HolyKingCrusader File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HolyKingCrusader One more idea I had was that we could make it more open for future extensions. How about if there was a
TestIDFunc
(or similar) field which would default toNewTestID
, but any other could be supplied? (LikeNewTestULID()
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@m110 Would it be used anywhere currently or just left for future use?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess in scenarios like those mentioned in #226. Similar to what you originally proposed. My point is to make it a bit more open for extension rather than just a UUID/ULID choice. It's not a big deal, though, so let me know your thoughts.
To be clear, I meant having a config field like
TestIDGenerator func() TestID
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add it, doesn't seem to be too difficult
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @HolyKingCrusader, sorry about the delay here 😅
WIth the field you added to configure the function, the
UseULID
would be redundant now, correct?Also, I think the
default
struct tag won't work like this out of the box, you might need to manually check if it's set and default toNewTestID
otherwise.