Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding schematic diagram to walkercreek #11

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024
Merged

Adding schematic diagram to walkercreek #11

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

tives82
Copy link
Collaborator

@tives82 tives82 commented Jun 7, 2024

I've created a schematic diagram for the walkercreek pipeline. This PR is only to add this diagram.

  • added walkercreek.schematic.dark.png and walkercreek.schematic.light.png to docs/images
  • updated README.md to reflect diagram

@tives82 tives82 requested review from erinyoung and jwarnn June 7, 2024 18:12
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 5a9bda8

+| ✅  16 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   6 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   2 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in WorkflowMain.groovy: Add Zenodo DOI for pipeline after first release
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in meta.yml: #Add a description of all of the variables used as input

❔ Tests ignored:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.7.2
  • Run at 2024-06-07 18:13:50

Copy link
Member

@erinyoung erinyoung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks clear to me

@tives82 tives82 merged commit e108c7e into master Jun 7, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@erinyoung
Copy link
Member

You might want to delete the nf-core github action tests that you're ignoring.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants