Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naked delegates should have event modifier keyword #3134

Closed
StephenHodgson opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Naked delegates should have event modifier keyword #3134

StephenHodgson opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@StephenHodgson
Copy link

StephenHodgson commented Nov 21, 2024

Delegate events like the one shown above should have event keyword modifiers.

 public event OnValueChangedDelegate OnValueChanged; 

A "naked" delegate refers to a delegate that is declared without the event keyword. This means the delegate is exposed directly, allowing external code to not only subscribe and unsubscribe to it but also to reassign or invoke it directly. This can lead to unintended side effects and potential bugs.

For example, in the provided code snippet, the delegates are correctly declared as events:

public event Action OnSpawnedLocal;
public event Action OnSpawnedAll;
public event Action<NetworkPlayer> OnDisconnected;

If these were declared as naked delegates, they would look like this:

public Action OnSpawnedLocal;
public Action OnSpawnedAll;
public Action<NetworkPlayer> OnDisconnected;

Issues with naked delegates:

  1. Reassignment: External code can reassign the delegate, potentially removing all existing subscribers.

    networkPlayer.OnSpawnedLocal = SomeMethod; // Reassigns the delegate, removing all previous subscribers.
  2. Invocation: It breaks encapsulation, making it harder to control how and when the delegate is invoked.

    networkPlayer.OnSpawnedLocal?.Invoke(); // Invokes the delegate from outside the class.
  3. Dangling Pointers: Events in C# are multicast delegates which can have multiple and anonymous methods subscribe to the same event. Using the event keyword will help properly manage those subscriptions and unsubscriptions. This way if someone forgets to unsubscribe, the dangling pointer will get properly cleaned up by garbage collector.

  • If a delegate holds a reference to an object that should be garbage collected, it can prevent the object from being collected, leading to memory leaks.
  • If the target method or object of a delegate has been collected, invoking the delegate can result in a NullReferenceException or other runtime errors.

TR;DL:

I've seen this throughout the whole codebase and highly encourage the use of the event keyword for all usages of delegate callbacks.
Using the event keyword ensures that the delegate can only be invoked from within the class that declares it, maintaining proper encapsulation and control over the event's lifecycle and avoiding memory pressure from forgetting to unassign the delegates after use.

@StephenHodgson StephenHodgson changed the title Naked delegates should have event modifier Naked delegates should have event modifier keyword Nov 22, 2024
@StephenHodgson
Copy link
Author

moved to #3137

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant