-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat/improve file data batch content #302
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Deferring comments on the actual changes for a sec - the sheer proportion of the diff dedicated to innocuous changes to test fixtures is really striking me this time around. Have we explored pulling the artifacts (and perhaps even the scenarios themselves) into a different system? Manage them like artifacts - out of band from the code?
My next comment, again not truly a code level conversation yet, but closer: How do you feel about collapsing the case of single and batch into a world where everything is a batch, and it just so happens that sometimes that batch is of size 1? |
3a0eda3
to
e0e6dd1
Compare
c2646a0
to
ba84286
Compare
Description
Convert the
FileData
class to be a pydantic model to have better field validation on it. Also create inheritedFileData
classes for batch support and inter-index-downloader communication.