Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uses John Hopkins CSSE Data for US #78

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bdarfler
Copy link

@bdarfler bdarfler commented Apr 8, 2020

The NYT data methodology differs from from the John Hopkins
methodology.

This change attempts to ensure consistency between the world data and
the US data by using the John Hopkins CSSE data set for both.

@bdarfler
Copy link
Author

bdarfler commented Apr 8, 2020

Hi, I hope jumping right to a PR isn't skipping a process here. I've been looking over the NYT data and the JHCSSE data, particularly at the county level, and I am finding them hard to reconcile.

I believe this is because they are trying to answer different questions. John Hopkins seems to be reporting governmental data directly whereas NYT is trying to add an additional layer of reporting and investigation on top. While I applaud that effort it makes it hard to reconcile with the John Hopkins data.

Since NYT is US-focused only and this project is globally focused, I thought I would offer this PR to standardize the project on the John Hopkins data.

@bdarfler bdarfler force-pushed the uses-jh-csse-data-for-us branch 3 times, most recently from 83d9481 to 3b6f61f Compare April 8, 2020 14:08
@bdarfler bdarfler mentioned this pull request Apr 9, 2020
The NYT data [methodology][1] differs from from the John Hopkins
methodology.

This change attempts to ensure consistency between the world data and
the US data by using the John Hopkins CSSE data set for both.

[1]: https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data#methodology-and-definitions
@bdarfler bdarfler force-pushed the uses-jh-csse-data-for-us branch from 3b6f61f to 356756a Compare April 23, 2020 00:17
@bdarfler
Copy link
Author

bdarfler commented Apr 23, 2020

Rebased

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant