build images online #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces comprehensive updates across several files related to Docker image management. The workflow in Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/docker-image.yml (3)
1-11: Improved workflow name and trigger conditions.The updated workflow name and refined trigger conditions are good improvements. They provide better clarity and control over when the workflow runs.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Replace the Chinese comments with English for better international collaboration.
- Fix the typo in the comment on line 10 (remove the 'x' at the end).
- Consider using a single comment for both
mainandmasterbranches to reduce redundancy.Example:
branches: - main - master # Include both main and master branches
24-47: Excellent Docker build and push configuration.The new steps for Docker setup, login, metadata extraction, and image building are well-structured and utilize best practices. The use of official Docker GitHub Actions and multi-platform builds is commendable.
Consider adding a step to cache Docker layers, which can significantly speed up subsequent builds:
- name: Cache Docker layers uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: /tmp/.buildx-cache key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-Then, update the build step to use the cache:
- name: Build and push Docker image uses: docker/build-push-action@v4 with: context: . platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64 push: true tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }} labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }} cache-from: type=local,src=/tmp/.buildx-cache cache-to: type=local,dest=/tmp/.buildx-cache-new,mode=maxThis can help reduce build times in subsequent runs.
1-47: Overall excellent improvements to the Docker build workflow.The revamped workflow significantly enhances the Docker image build and push process. It now follows best practices, uses official actions, and includes multi-platform support.
To further improve the workflow, consider adding a step to scan the Docker image for vulnerabilities before pushing. This can be achieved using a tool like Trivy:
- name: Scan image for vulnerabilities uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master with: image-ref: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }}:${{ github.sha }} format: 'table' exit-code: '1' ignore-unfixed: true vuln-type: 'os,library' severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'This step would ensure that no known high or critical vulnerabilities are present in the image before it's pushed to the registry.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
22-22: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/docker-image.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/docker-image.yml
22-22: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/docker-image.yml (1)
12-14: Well-defined environment variables for Docker image configuration.The addition of
REGISTRYandIMAGE_NAMEas environment variables is a good practice. It centralizes the configuration and makes the workflow more maintainable.
| - name: Checkout repository | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update checkout action to the latest version.
While using a specific version is good for stability, the current version (v2) of the actions/checkout action is outdated.
Update to the latest version to ensure you have the most recent features and bug fixes:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
+ uses: actions/checkout@v3This will resolve the warning from the static analysis tool and potentially provide performance improvements.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Checkout repository | |
| uses: actions/checkout@v2 | |
| - name: Checkout repository | |
| uses: actions/checkout@v3 |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
22-22: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
Dockerfile (2)
Line range hint
7-38: Update Dockerfile to align with ROS 1 Noetic environmentThe current Dockerfile contains several instructions that are incompatible with the new ROS 1 Noetic base image. Here are the main issues:
- Colcon usage: Colcon is specific to ROS 2 and is not typically used with ROS 1.
- ROS package installation: The installation of
ros-humble-desktopis incompatible with ROS 1 Noetic.- Rosdep initialization: This might need adjustments for the new ROS distro.
Please update the Dockerfile to align with the ROS 1 Noetic environment. Here are some suggested changes:
- Remove or replace colcon-related instructions with catkin-specific ones.
- Update the ROS package installation to use Noetic packages instead of Humble.
- Verify and adjust the rosdep initialization process if necessary.
Here's a partial diff to guide the changes:
- python3-colcon-common-extensions \ - python3-colcon-mixin \ + python3-catkin-tools \ - RUN colcon mixin add default \ - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/colcon/colcon-mixin-repository/master/index.yaml && \ - colcon mixin update && \ - colcon metadata add default \ - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/colcon/colcon-metadata-repository/master/index.yaml && \ - colcon metadata update - RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \ - ros-humble-desktop=0.10.0-1* \ + RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \ + ros-noetic-desktop \ && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*Please review and adjust these changes as needed to ensure compatibility with your project requirements.
Line range hint
1-38: Summary: Major revision required for ROS 1 Noetic compatibilityThis Dockerfile has undergone a significant change in its base image, switching from ROS 2 Humble to ROS 1 Noetic. This change has far-reaching implications for the entire project and requires a comprehensive revision of the Dockerfile and potentially the project codebase.
Key points:
- The base image change represents a downgrade from ROS 2 to ROS 1 and from Ubuntu 22.04 to 20.04.
- Many parts of the Dockerfile are now incompatible with the new ROS 1 Noetic environment.
Next steps:
- Confirm if the switch to ROS 1 Noetic is intentional and aligns with the project goals.
- If confirmed, update the entire Dockerfile to be compatible with ROS 1 Noetic, including build tools, package installations, and environment setup.
- Review and update the project codebase to ensure compatibility with ROS 1 Noetic.
- If the switch was unintentional, revert the base image change and keep the ROS 2 Humble setup.
Given the extent of the changes required, it might be beneficial to have a broader discussion about the project's ROS version requirements and the implications of this change before proceeding with the updates.
README.md (4)
70-86: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about$SCRIPT_DIR.The
ros_dev()function is a well-structured addition that facilitates the setup of ROS2 Docker development environments. It handles multiple container-project pairs flexibly and includes proper error checking.Consider adding a comment explaining what
$SCRIPT_DIRrepresents and how it should be set. This will improve clarity for users who might copy this function into their shell configuration.
Line range hint
1-62: LGTM! Consider adding a note aboutsetup.sh.The English instructions for using the
ros_dev()function are clear, comprehensive, and provide valuable information about accessing containers and visualizations. The inclusion of both VNC and rocker methods for hardware acceleration is particularly helpful.Consider adding a brief note explaining what the
setup.shscript does and how to use it, as it's mentioned but not elaborated upon. This would provide users with a complete understanding of all setup options.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
103-103: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
65-113: LGTM! Consider maintaining consistency between English and Chinese instructions.The addition of Chinese instructions is excellent for making the project more accessible to a wider audience. The step-by-step guide is clear and concise, providing valuable information on setting up and using the ROS2 Docker environment.
To maintain consistency, consider adding the information about rocker and hardware acceleration to the Chinese instructions as well. This will ensure that both language versions provide the same level of detail and options to users.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
103-103: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
69-69: Specify languages for fenced code blocks.To improve markdown formatting and enable proper syntax highlighting, please specify the language for the following fenced code blocks:
- Line 69: Add the language specifier (e.g.,
bashorsh) after the opening triple backticks.- Line 96: Add the language specifier (e.g.,
bashorsh) after the opening triple backticks.- Line 103: Add the language specifier (e.g.,
bashorsh) after the opening triple backticks.Example:
-``` +```bash # Your code hereAlso applies to: 96-96, 103-103 <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> 69-69: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </details> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3996a4faee1341e158a33ba9fafb6c30f9e66944 and 25ada83d1a41116a22e2bf9b432071b4040f0b21. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (4)</summary> * Dockerfile (1 hunks) * README.md (1 hunks) * docker-compose.yml (1 hunks) * setup.sh (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>README.md</summary><blockquote> 69-69: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 96-96: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) --- 103-103: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (1)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>Dockerfile (1)</summary><blockquote> `2-4`: _:warning: Potential issue_ **Major change in ROS version and Ubuntu base - Verify project compatibility** The base image has been changed from `ros:humble-ros-core-jammy` to `ros:noetic-ros-core-focal`. This represents a significant shift in the development environment: 1. ROS version: Downgraded from ROS 2 Humble to ROS 1 Noetic. 2. Ubuntu version: Downgraded from Jammy (22.04) to Focal (20.04). This change has far-reaching implications for the project: - ROS 1 and ROS 2 have different architectures and APIs. Existing code may not be compatible. - Some ROS 2 features might not be available in ROS 1. - Ubuntu version change might affect system dependencies and available packages. Please verify that this change is intentional and that the project is compatible with ROS 1 Noetic and Ubuntu 20.04. If not, consider reverting to the ROS 2 Humble base image. To check for potential compatibility issues, run the following script: This script will help identify potential compatibility issues that need to be addressed due to the change from ROS 2 to ROS 1. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
| @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ echo 'ros_dev() { | |||
| shift 2 | |||
|
|
|||
| # Run docker-compose from the correct directory | |||
| cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d --build | |||
| cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Reinstate the --build flag in the docker-compose command
The removal of the --build flag from the docker-compose up command can lead to the use of outdated Docker images. Since both Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml are present in the repository, it's essential to ensure that any changes to the Docker configurations are reflected in the running containers.
Recommended Actions:
-
Reinstate the
--buildflag to ensure that images are rebuilt with the latest changes:cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d --build
-
Alternatively, modify the
ros_devfunction to accept an optional rebuild parameter, allowing flexibility:ros_dev() { local rebuild=false if [[ "$1" == "--rebuild" ]]; then rebuild=true shift fi # ... (rest of the function) if $rebuild; then cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d --build else cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d fi # ... }
This approach allows developers to choose when to rebuild images, balancing speed and consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
Reconsider removing the --build flag from docker-compose command
The removal of the --build flag from the docker-compose up command has several implications:
- It will speed up the container startup process as images won't be rebuilt every time.
- However, it introduces a risk of running outdated environments if there have been changes to the Dockerfile or build context.
- This change may lead to inconsistencies between different developers' environments if they don't manually rebuild at the same time.
Consider the following options:
- Revert the change to keep the
--buildflag for consistency and to ensure up-to-date environments. - Add a new parameter to the
ros_devfunction to optionally trigger a rebuild, e.g.:ros_dev() { local rebuild=false if [[ "$1" == "--rebuild" ]]; then rebuild=true shift fi # ... (rest of the function) if $rebuild; then cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d --build else cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d fi # ... }
- Add a comment in the function to remind users to manually rebuild when necessary:
# Note: Images are not automatically rebuilt. Run 'docker-compose build' manually when needed.
To understand the impact of this change, let's check if there are any Dockerfiles or docker-compose.yml files in the repository:
This will help us understand the Docker setup and potential implications of not rebuilding images.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml
echo "Searching for Dockerfile:"
fd Dockerfile
echo "Searching for docker-compose.yml:"
fd docker-compose.yml
Length of output: 207
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docker-image.yml (1)
26-49: LGTM: Comprehensive Docker build and push setupThe new steps for Docker setup, registry login, metadata extraction, and image building are well-structured and follow best practices. The multi-platform support and use of metadata for tagging and labeling are excellent additions.
One minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a step to scan the Docker image for vulnerabilities before pushing. You can use a tool like Trivy or Snyk. Here's an example using Trivy:
- name: Scan image for vulnerabilities uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master with: image-ref: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }}:${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }} format: 'table' exit-code: '1' ignore-unfixed: true vuln-type: 'os,library' severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH'This step would help ensure the security of your Docker images before they are pushed to the registry.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/docker-image.yml (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/docker-image.yml
24-24: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Dockerfile (4)
35-35: LGTM: Added ENTRYPOINT for ROS environment setupThe addition of
ENTRYPOINT ["/ros_entrypoint.sh"]is a good practice for ROS Docker images. This script typically sets up the ROS environment, ensuring that the correct ROS-related environment variables are set when the container starts.This change aligns with best practices for ROS Docker images and should help ensure consistent environment setup across different uses of this image.
32-32: Updated ROS package installationThe ROS package installation has been updated to align with the change to ROS Noetic:
- Changed from
ros-humble-desktop=0.10.0-1*toros-noetic-desktop- Removed the specific version constraint
Consider the following points:
- Ensure that all required ROS packages are available in the Noetic distribution.
- The removal of the version constraint might lead to potential inconsistencies in builds. Consider if a specific version should be pinned for reproducibility.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ROS Noetic package availability and suggest version pinning # Test: Check if ros-noetic-desktop is available echo "Checking ros-noetic-desktop package availability:" apt-cache show ros-noetic-desktop # Test: Get the latest version of ros-noetic-desktop for potential pinning echo "Latest version of ros-noetic-desktop:" apt-cache policy ros-noetic-desktop | grep Candidate
37-37: Changed default command to start roscoreThe default command has been changed from
["/bin/bash"]to["roscore"]. This modification has the following implications:
- The container will now start the ROS master (roscore) by default when run without overriding the command.
- Users who expect to get a bash shell when running the container will need to explicitly specify it (e.g.,
docker run ... /bin/bash).Consider the following:
- Ensure this change aligns with the intended use of the container.
- Update documentation to reflect this change in default behavior.
- Verify that this doesn't break any existing workflows that depend on getting a bash shell by default.
✅ Verification successful
CMD Change Verified Successfully
The default command has been changed from
["/bin/bash"]to["roscore"]. Based on the verification:
- No existing
docker runcommands in the codebase rely on the previous default CMD.- There are no identified dependencies that would be affected by this change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential impacts of changing the default command # Test: Search for docker run commands in scripts or documentation that might be affected echo "Checking for docker run commands that might need updating:" rg 'docker run.*ros'Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for docker run commands that explicitly use /bin/bash echo "Searching for docker run commands that specify /bin/bash as the command:" rg 'docker run.*[/]bin[/]bash'Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all docker run commands to identify reliance on the default CMD echo "Searching for all docker run commands in the codebase:" rg 'docker\s+run'Length of output: 138
2-4: Major change: Switching from ROS 2 Humble to ROS 1 NoeticThis change represents a significant shift in the ROS ecosystem being used:
- Moving from ROS 2 (Humble) to ROS 1 (Noetic)
- Changing the underlying Ubuntu version from 22.04 (Jammy) to 20.04 (Focal)
This alteration could have far-reaching implications for the entire project, including:
- Compatibility issues with existing code and dependencies
- Different APIs and package structures between ROS 1 and ROS 2
- Potential loss of features and improvements introduced in ROS 2
Please confirm if this change is intentional and aligns with the project's goals. If so, ensure that all project dependencies and code are compatible with ROS 1 Noetic.
.github/workflows/docker-image.yml (4)
1-13: LGTM: Improved workflow name and trigger conditionsThe updated workflow name is more descriptive, and the trigger conditions are well-defined. This change improves clarity and ensures the workflow runs only when necessary.
14-16: LGTM: Well-defined environment variablesThe addition of REGISTRY and IMAGE_NAME as environment variables enhances the workflow's configurability and reusability. Using github.repository for IMAGE_NAME is a good practice that ensures consistency across different repositories.
1-49: Great job on overhauling the Docker image workflowThis updated workflow represents a significant improvement in the Docker image build and push process. Key enhancements include:
- Clear and descriptive workflow name
- Well-defined trigger conditions
- Use of environment variables for better configurability
- Comprehensive setup for Docker operations (Buildx, login, metadata)
- Multi-platform build support
- Proper use of metadata for tagging and labeling
These changes align with GitHub Actions best practices and should result in a more robust and maintainable CI/CD process for Docker images.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
24-24: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
23-24:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate checkout action to the latest version
The current version (v2) of the
actions/checkoutaction is outdated. Update to the latest version to ensure you have the most recent features and bug fixes:- uses: actions/checkout@v2 + uses: actions/checkout@v3This will resolve the warning from the static analysis tool and potentially provide performance improvements.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
24-24: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)
70-86: LGTM! Consider defining$SCRIPT_DIR.The
ros_dev()function is a well-structured addition that facilitates the setup of ROS2 Docker development environments. It includes proper input validation and supports multiple container setups.Consider adding a comment or instruction to define
$SCRIPT_DIRbefore this function, as it's used in thecdcommand but not defined in the provided snippet. This will ensure users correctly set up their environment.
65-106: LGTM! Consider adding a note about$SCRIPT_DIR.The English instructions are clear, concise, and cover all necessary steps from setup to visualization. The use of code blocks enhances readability and makes it easy for users to follow along.
Consider adding a note explaining how to set the
$SCRIPT_DIRvariable, as it's used in theros_dev()function but not explicitly defined in the instructions. This will ensure users can successfully run the provided commands.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
103-103: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
110-110: Improve markdown formatting for better readability.There are a few minor markdown formatting issues that can be improved:
- On line 110, there's a bare URL. It's better to use proper markdown link syntax.
- Some fenced code blocks are missing language specifications, which can improve syntax highlighting.
Here are the suggested fixes:
Replace the bare URL on line 110 with:
[http://localhost:8080/](http://localhost:8080/)Add language specifications to the fenced code blocks:
- Line 69: Add
zshafter the opening ``` (for Zsh script)- Line 96: Add
shafter the opening ``` (for shell commands)- Line 103: Add
shafter the opening ``` (for shell commands)These changes will improve the overall formatting and readability of the README.
Also applies to: 69-69, 96-96, 103-103
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
110-110: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
110-110: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
103-103: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
67-109: LGTM! Consider verifying the Chinese translation.The addition of Chinese instructions is a great way to improve accessibility for a wider audience. The instructions appear to cover the same steps as the English version.
As an AI, I'm not qualified to verify the accuracy of the translation. Please ensure that a native Chinese speaker or a qualified translator reviews the Chinese instructions to confirm their accuracy and clarity.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
103-103: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)
70-86: LGTM! Consider adding a success message.The
ros_dev()function is well-structured and includes proper error checking. It effectively sets up the ROS2 Docker development environment by processing container names and project paths in pairs.Consider adding a success message at the end of the function to provide feedback to the user. For example:
ros_dev() { # ... existing code ... while (( $# >= 2 )); do # ... existing code ... cd "$SCRIPT_DIR" && docker-compose up -d done + echo "ROS2 Docker development environment(s) set up successfully." }
65-112: Instructions are clear and helpful. Add language specifiers to code blocks.The added instructions provide a comprehensive guide for setting up and using the ROS2 Docker development environment. The step-by-step approach is user-friendly and easy to follow.
To improve the formatting and syntax highlighting, add language specifiers to the code blocks. Apply the following changes:
- Line 69: Change
tozsh- Line 96: Change
tosh- Line 105: Change
toshThis will address the MD040 warnings from Markdownlint and enhance the readability of the code blocks.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
112-112: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
105-105: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
112-112: Wrap the bare URL in angle brackets.To improve Markdown compatibility and address the MD034 warning, wrap the URL in angle brackets.
Change line 112 from:
http://localhost:8080/to:
<http://localhost:8080/>This small change will improve the formatting and eliminate the Markdownlint warning.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
112-112: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- docker-compose.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
README.md
112-112: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
69-69: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
96-96: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
105-105: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
6-6: Typo in Comment: Correct 'commandsx' to 'commands'There's a typo in the comment. The word "commandsx" should be corrected to "commands".
Suggested fix:
-# Set shell for running commandsx +# Set shell for running commands
35-37: Assess the Impact of Setting ENTRYPOINT and CMDAdding
ENTRYPOINT ["/ros_entrypoint.sh"]and changingCMDto["roscore"]will cause the container to automatically startroscorewhen run. This configuration may limit flexibility if you need to execute other commands or use the container interactively. Consider whether this behavior aligns with the intended use of the container.
| # FROM ros:humble-ros-core-jammy | ||
|
|
||
| # Set shell for running commands | ||
| FROM ros:noetic-ros-core-focal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: Downgrading from ROS2 Humble to ROS1 Noetic
The base image has been changed from ros:humble-ros-core-jammy (ROS2 Humble) to ros:noetic-ros-core-focal (ROS1 Noetic). This change downgrades the ROS version from ROS2 to ROS1, which may introduce incompatibilities if the project relies on ROS2 features or packages. Please verify that this change is intentional and compatible with the project's requirements.
build images online
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ros_dev()function for setting up a ROS2 Docker development environment.Bug Fixes
Documentation
README.mdwith detailed instructions for using the newros_dev()function, available in both English and Chinese.Chores
docker-compose.ymlfor consistency.setup.shto streamline the Docker container startup process.