Skip to content

cilium-agent container can access the host via `hostPath` mount

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 17, 2023 in cilium/cilium • Updated Mar 20, 2023

Package

gomod github.com/cilium/cilium (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.11.15
>= 1.12.0, < 1.12.8
>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.1

Patched versions

1.11.15
1.12.8
1.13.1

Description

Impact

An attacker with access to a Cilium agent pod can write to /opt/cni/bin due to a hostPath mount of that directory in the agent pod. By replacing the CNI binary with their own malicious binary and waiting for the creation of a new pod on the node, the attacker can gain access to the underlying node.

Patches

The issue has been fixed and is available on versions >=1.11.15, >=1.12.8, >=1.13.1.

Workarounds

Kubernetes RBAC should be used to deny users and service accounts exec access to Cilium agent pods.

In cases where a user requires exec access to Cilium agent pods, but should not have access to the underlying node, no workaround is possible.

References

Acknowledgements

The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent and Form3 to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to Anastasios Koutlis, Daniel Teixeira, and Magdalena Oczadly for their cooperation.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.

As usual, if you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list: security@cilium.io - first, before disclosing them in any public forums. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and is treated as top priority.

References

@nebril nebril published to cilium/cilium Mar 17, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 17, 2023
Reviewed Mar 17, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 17, 2023
Last updated Mar 20, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

0.045%
(15th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-27593

GHSA ID

GHSA-4hc4-pgfx-3mrx

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.