Skip to content

Vyper's external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Feb 2, 2024 in vyperlang/vyper • Updated Nov 22, 2024

Package

pip vyper (pip)

Affected versions

< 0.4.0

Patched versions

0.4.0

Description

Summary

When calls to external contracts are made, we write the input buffer starting at byte 28, and allocate the return buffer to start at byte 0 (overlapping with the input buffer). When checking RETURNDATASIZE for dynamic types, the size is compared only to the minimum allowed size for that type, and not to the returned value's length. As a result, malformed return data can cause the contract to mistake data from the input buffer for returndata.

This advisory is given a severity of "Low" because when the called contract returns invalid ABIv2 encoded data, the calling contract can read different invalid data (from the dirty buffer) than the called contract returned.

Details

When arguments are packed for an external call, we create a buffer of size max(args, return_data) + 32. The input buffer is placed in this buffer (starting at byte 28), and the return buffer is allocated to start at byte 0. The assumption is that we can reuse the memory becase we will not be able to read past RETURNDATASIZE.

if fn_type.return_type is not None:
    return_abi_t = calculate_type_for_external_return(fn_type.return_type).abi_type

    # we use the same buffer for args and returndata,
    # so allocate enough space here for the returndata too.
    buflen = max(args_abi_t.size_bound(), return_abi_t.size_bound())
else:
    buflen = args_abi_t.size_bound()

buflen += 32  # padding for the method id

When data is returned, we unpack the return data by starting at byte 0. We check that RETURNDATASIZE is greater than the minimum allowed for the returned type:

if not call_kwargs.skip_contract_check:
    assertion = IRnode.from_list(
        ["assert", ["ge", "returndatasize", min_return_size]],
        error_msg="returndatasize too small",
    )
    unpacker.append(assertion)

This check ensures that any dynamic types returned will have a size of at least 64. However, it does not verify that RETURNDATASIZE is as large as the length word of the dynamic type.

As a result, if a contract expects a dynamic type to be returned, and the part of the return data that is read as length includes a size that is larger than the actual RETURNDATASIZE, the return data read from the buffer will overrun the actual return data size and read from the input buffer.

Proof of Concept

This contract calls an external contract with two arguments. As the call is made, the buffer includes:

  • byte 28: method_id
  • byte 32: first argument (0)
  • byte 64: second argument (hash)

The return data buffer begins at byte 0, and will return the returned bytestring, up to a maximum length of 96 bytes.

interface Zero:
    def sneaky(a: uint256, b: bytes32) -> Bytes[96]: view

@external
def test_sneaky(z: address) -> Bytes[96]:
    return Zero(z).sneaky(0, keccak256("oops"))

On the other side, imagine a simple contract that does not, in fact, return a bytestring, but instead returns two uint256s. I've implemented it in Solidity for ease of use with Foundry:

function sneaky(uint a, bytes32 b) external pure returns (uint, uint) {
    return (32, 32);
}

The return data will be parsed as a bytestring. The first 32 will point us to byte 32 to read the length. The second 32 will be perceived as the length. It will then read the next 32 bytes from the return data buffer, even though those weren't a part of the return data.

Since these bytes will come from byte 64, we can see above that the hash was placed there in the input buffer.

If we run the following Foundry test, we can see that this does in fact happen:

function test__sneakyZeroReturn() public {
    ZeroReturn z = new ZeroReturn();
    c = SuperContract(deployer.deploy("src/loose/", "ret_overflow", ""));
    console.logBytes(c.test_sneaky(address(z)));
}
Logs:
  0xd54c03ccbc84dd6002c98c6df5a828e42272fc54b512ca20694392ca89c4d2c6

Patches

Patched in vyperlang/vyper#3925, vyperlang/vyper#4091, vyperlang/vyper#4144, vyperlang/vyper#4060.

Impact

Malicious or mistaken contracts returning the malformed data can result in overrunning the returned data and reading return data from the input buffer.

References

@charles-cooper charles-cooper published to vyperlang/vyper Feb 2, 2024
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 2, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 2, 2024
Reviewed Feb 2, 2024
Last updated Nov 22, 2024

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.046%
(19th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-24560

GHSA ID

GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.