Upd use docker compose v2 fixes #159
Conversation
docky/cmd/run_open.py
Outdated
| if self.root: | ||
| user = "root" | ||
| return user | ||
| return self.project.get_user(service) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
aahahha my finger didn't do what my brand was thinking !!
It's ok now
docky/cmd/run_open.py
Outdated
| @@ -53,7 +52,7 @@ class DockyRun(DockyExec): | |||
| """Start services and enter in your dev container""" | |||
|
|
|||
| def _check_running(self): | |||
| if self.project.get_containers(service=self.service): | |||
| if docker.compose.ps(services=[self.service], all=True): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if you do not pass all, you do not see the odoo container as it launch with "run". All is to show all container even if there are not launch with the normal way "docker compose up"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
but will you get exited containers ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: in the previous version we had the same behavior
And normally you should never have exited container for the main container (as we launch it with --rm).
But if you have used manually docker compose run and you didn't have launch docker compose rm
then you have an exited container and docky run is blocked !
So we can first remove this existed container (as it will stay here indefinitely) and then start the container correctly. See commit : 0c60eeb
docky/common/project.py
Outdated
| for _name, service in self.project.get("services").items(): | ||
| docky_help = service.get("labels", {}).get("docky.help") | ||
| if docky_help: | ||
| logger.info(docky_help) | ||
|
|
||
| def create_volume(self): | ||
| """Mkdir volumes if they don't exist yet. | ||
|
|
||
| Only apply to external volumes. | ||
| docker-compose up do not attemps to create it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| docker-compose up do not attemps to create it | |
| docker compose up create volumes automatically, but docker compose run don't |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in fact the comment was totally wrong docker compose always create the volume but with the user root. I fix it
sebastienbeau
force-pushed
the
UPD-use_docker_compose_v2-fixes
branch
from
f219a8c to
cfb645a
Compare
|
@paradoxxxzero @hparfr updated |
|
Thank you @sebastienbeau , if you think will be better has a "clean" commits I can see to include your changes of:
During this time I'm also think in a way to make Docky more abstract, what a thought was allow change the default command $ docky run by a parameter in the docker-compose.yml file, for example if include something like: odoo: or in the .env odoo: This command will overridden the Default, with this we can allow each Project has, if necessary, a specific parameters Saved in the file and in the big projects the most part of the Developers can ignore those specific parameters by just typing docky run or the Docky can be use for projects beyond Odoo case, but it's just a test, a speculation, let me know if you think it can be useful or not. |
|
@mbcosta thanks for your feedback, I will squash the commit before merge them. Regarding the option of
|
|
I have added a task for the option on docky run /exec #160 |
- included library python-on-whales to get some Config information from compose.yml files. - Remove the logic of getting ip information as now we always use traefik - Raise the right error message when the config is not valid Co-authored-by: Sébastien BEAU <sebastien.beau@akretion.com>
…cker info' for check errors related to OS or older or newer libraries versions.
Remove dcpatched and hack for kill as docker compose work correctly Co-authored-by: Sébastien BEAU <sebastien.beau@akretion.com>
sebastienbeau
force-pushed
the
UPD-use_docker_compose_v2-fixes
branch
from
0c60eeb to
9ced2c2
Compare
sebastienbeau
changed the base branch from
UPD-use_docker_compose_v2
to
master
@mbcosta I have done some additionnal fixes on your PR
We can merge it and then release a new version.
The next step is to add some test (I will try to do it in a separated PR)