Added usage section in ReadMe and basic example for simulator #314

CarlottaSartore · 2024-12-09T14:51:25Z

This PR:

Adds the usage section in the main readme
Simplifies the main readme entry in favour of the usage section
Added an example that shows the basic usage of jaxsim as simulator
Renamed the example_physics_engine in example_physics_engine_advanced

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://jaxsim--314.org.readthedocs.build//314/

…ction in readme

CarlottaSartore · 2024-12-09T15:00:49Z

When loading the icub model, I encountered in the following warning:

jaxsim[141861] DEBUG Found model 'iCub' in SDF resource
/home/carlotta/miniforge3/envs/jaxsim/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rod/sdf/model.py:166: UserWarning: Gimbal lock detected. Setting third angle to zero since it is not possible to uniquely determine all angles.
  switch_frame_convention(

I am having issues in backtracking the source, @flferretti do you perhaps know which part of rod raises this warning ? thanks !

flferretti · 2024-12-09T15:03:16Z

When loading the icub model, I encountered in the following warning:
jaxsim[141861] DEBUG Found model 'iCub' in SDF resource
/home/carlotta/miniforge3/envs/jaxsim/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rod/sdf/model.py:166: UserWarning: Gimbal lock detected. Setting third angle to zero since it is not possible to uniquely determine all angles.
  switch_frame_convention(
I am having issues in backtracking the source, @flferretti do you perhaps know which part of rod raises this warning ? thanks !

Hi @CarlottaSartore, thanks for the contribution! The warning is not raised from rod, but rather from scipy.spatial.transform.Rotation in https://github.com/ami-iit/rod/blob/c67a77da59bfe6d5d7df8abf2c4878b78877079a/src/rod/sdf/common.py#L101

traversaro · 2024-12-09T15:11:12Z

Related: scipy/scipy#19512 and https://mail.python.org/archives/list/scipy-dev@python.org/message/LXT4ZGNP4OVAARSKEOM5AGQCANH6ZV5K/ . I totally agree that this should not be a warning, or there should be a way to provide this conversion without triggering a warning, but unfortunately there was not a follow up in the mailing list.

flferretti · 2024-12-09T15:13:02Z

Early comment: can we use robot_description.icub_description instead of adding an additional dependency?

- import icub_models
- model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

+ import robot_description.icub_description
+ model_path = robot_description.icub_description.URDF_PATH

traversaro · 2024-12-09T15:16:05Z

Early comment: can we use robot_description.icub_description instead of adding an additional dependency?
- import icub_models
- model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

+ import robot_description.icub_description
+ model_path = robot_description.icub_description.URDF_PATH

I strongly prefer use any other robot in that case. There is nothing ensuring that the robot_description.icub_description model is updated or it even matches the real iCub robot, so I would prefer to avoid IIT users getting used to get IIT's model from robot_description. Just to give you an example, the model used is the iCubGazeboV2_5, see https://github.com/robot-descriptions/robot_descriptions.py/blob/b3cf619db307d98aad0f02f79e4818bcc89fe55d/robot_descriptions/icub_description.py#L22 . The Gazebo in the name indicates the the inertia used in the model are completely wrong for compatibility with the default settings of Gazebo Classic with the ODE physics engines (see robotology/icub-models#33 for more details). Most users are (unfortunately) already not aware of this, and it would be even more confusing if there is no Gazebo in the name, as it happens if one calls robot_description.icub_description.

flferretti · 2024-12-09T15:17:16Z

Early comment: can we use robot_description.icub_description instead of adding an additional dependency?
- import icub_models
- model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

+ import robot_description.icub_description
+ model_path = robot_description.icub_description.URDF_PATH
I strongly prefer use any other robot in that case. There is nothing ensuring that the robot_description.icub_description model is updated or it even matches the real iCub robot, so I would prefer to avoid IIT users getting used to get IIT's model from robot_description.

I see, thanks for the explanation! I was wondering though if we need the actual IIT model since this is just an example

traversaro · 2024-12-09T15:21:59Z

I was wondering though if we need the actual IIT model since this is just an example

The problem is that lab users starts from examples, that they copy and they start using assuming that that is the "best way" to do, especially if the info come from an official repo of the lab. I really do not look forward to having to explain each new student in the lab why they should not be using robot_description.icub_description if that is what is used in the jaxsim README.

traversaro · 2024-12-09T15:22:13Z

(I also edited my previous comments for more details).

CarlottaSartore · 2024-12-09T15:22:43Z

I see, thanks for the explanation! I was wondering though if we need the actual IIT model since this is just an example

I opted to use the icub models since it is the model of a humanoid robots, and I wanted to use a robot since this is the main goal of the simulator, and the icub is the model I am the more confident with.
A different solution could be as we do in the example, thus downloading ergoCub from the ergoCub software repository, this would require more lines but we will still use a humanoid robot without adding any dependencies (even if I liked the simplicity of the include, i took inspiration from https://github.com/ami-iit/adam)

traversaro · 2024-12-09T15:27:56Z

If it helps reach consensus, feel free to use robot_description with iCub, even if I am not super-enthusiastic about it.

A different solution could be as we do in the example, thus downloading ergoCub from the ergoCub software repository,

The tricky aspect there is that you also need to download the meshes if you want the visualizer to work.

flferretti · 2024-12-09T15:48:25Z

Thanks @traversaro, I understood the problem. It seems to me that the available options are:

Use a different robot, e.g. stickbot --> not the most exciting model, but it does its job
Still use iCub/ErgoCub from the official repos --> definitely more interesting, but requires more lines of code and downloading the meshes from source for visualization

flferretti

Thanks a lot for working on this @CarlottaSartore! I added some comments

examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb

examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

flferretti · 2024-12-10T09:55:39Z

examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

+    "data_batch_t0 = jax.vmap(\n",
+    "    lambda key: data_zero.reset_base_position(base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0]))\n",
+    ")(jnp.vstack(subkeys))\n",


Here we could think of using js.data.random_model_data instead, since key is not really used here, or generating a vector of equal base positions like:

data_batch_v0 = jax.vmap( data_zero.reset_base_position )(base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0] * batch_size))

The problem with random data is that is is difficult to ensure that all the simulations succed. this is the reason why I decided to set all of them to 1.0 to show how to handle batched initial data while still being sure that all simulations somehow work. Changing the initial base position leads the simulator to encounter "not normalize quaternion" error. I would prefer to leave it like this until we solve such an error.

Yes, I didn't mean to use random data. My comment was about which argument to pass to vmap, the result will be the same

flferretti · 2024-12-10T10:06:27Z

README.md

+```python
+import jax
+import jax.numpy as jnp
+import jaxsim.api as js
+import icub_models
+import pathlib
+
+# Load the iCub model
+model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")
+joints = ('torso_pitch', 'torso_roll', 'torso_yaw', 'l_shoulder_pitch',
+          'l_shoulder_roll', 'l_shoulder_yaw', 'l_elbow', 'r_shoulder_pitch',
+          'r_shoulder_roll', 'r_shoulder_yaw', 'r_elbow', 'l_hip_pitch',
+          'l_hip_roll', 'l_hip_yaw', 'l_knee', 'l_ankle_pitch', 'l_ankle_roll',
+          'r_hip_pitch', 'r_hip_roll', 'r_hip_yaw', 'r_knee', 'r_ankle_pitch',
+          'r_ankle_roll')
+ndof = len(joints)
+
+# Build and reduce the model
+model_description = pathlib.Path(model_path)
+full_model = js.model.JaxSimModel.build_from_model_description(
+    model_description=model_description, time_step=0.0001, is_urdf=True
+)
+model = js.model.reduce(model=full_model, considered_joints=joints)
+
+# Initialize data and simulation
+data = js.data.JaxSimModelData.zero(model=model).reset_base_position(
+    base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0])
+)
+T = jnp.arange(start=0, stop=1.0, step=model.time_step)
+tau = jnp.zeros(ndof)
+
+# Simulate
+for t in T:
+    data, _ = js.model.step(model=model, data=data, link_forces=None, joint_force_references=tau)


What do you think about compressing the example code in a collapsible section?
I also removed an unused import and reformatted

Suggested change

```python

import jax

import jax.numpy as jnp

import jaxsim.api as js

import icub_models

import pathlib

# Load the iCub model

model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

joints = ('torso_pitch', 'torso_roll', 'torso_yaw', 'l_shoulder_pitch',

'l_shoulder_roll', 'l_shoulder_yaw', 'l_elbow', 'r_shoulder_pitch',

'r_shoulder_roll', 'r_shoulder_yaw', 'r_elbow', 'l_hip_pitch',

'l_hip_roll', 'l_hip_yaw', 'l_knee', 'l_ankle_pitch', 'l_ankle_roll',

'r_hip_pitch', 'r_hip_roll', 'r_hip_yaw', 'r_knee', 'r_ankle_pitch',

'r_ankle_roll')

ndof = len(joints)

# Build and reduce the model

model_description = pathlib.Path(model_path)

full_model = js.model.JaxSimModel.build_from_model_description(

model_description=model_description, time_step=0.0001, is_urdf=True

)

model = js.model.reduce(model=full_model, considered_joints=joints)

# Initialize data and simulation

data = js.data.JaxSimModelData.zero(model=model).reset_base_position(

base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0])

)

T = jnp.arange(start=0, stop=1.0, step=model.time_step)

tau = jnp.zeros(ndof)

# Simulate

for t in T:

data, _ = js.model.step(model=model, data=data, link_forces=None, joint_force_references=tau)

<details>

<summary><b>Using JaxSim as a simulator</b></summary>

```python

import jax.numpy as jnp

import jaxsim.api as js

import icub_models

import pathlib

# Load the iCub model.

model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

joints = ('torso_pitch', 'torso_roll', 'torso_yaw', 'l_shoulder_pitch',

'l_shoulder_roll', 'l_shoulder_yaw', 'l_elbow', 'r_shoulder_pitch',

'r_shoulder_roll', 'r_shoulder_yaw', 'r_elbow', 'l_hip_pitch',

'l_hip_roll', 'l_hip_yaw', 'l_knee', 'l_ankle_pitch', 'l_ankle_roll',

'r_hip_pitch', 'r_hip_roll', 'r_hip_yaw', 'r_knee', 'r_ankle_pitch',

'r_ankle_roll')

# Build and reduce the model.

model_description = pathlib.Path(model_path)

full_model = js.model.JaxSimModel.build_from_model_description(

model_description=model_description, time_step=0.001, is_urdf=True

)

model = js.model.reduce(model=full_model, considered_joints=joints)

# Initialize data and simulation.

data = js.data.JaxSimModelData.zero(model=model).reset_base_position(

base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0])

)

T = jnp.arange(start=0, stop=1.0, step=model.time_step)

tau = jnp.zeros(model.dofs())

# Simulate.

for _t in T:

data, _ = js.model.step(

model=model, data=data, link_forces=None, joint_force_references=tau

)

SInce the example are quite short I would prefer to have them directly in the readme, so that it is directly visible that it is possible to use jaxsim within few lines of code, what do you think ?

flferretti · 2024-12-10T10:07:34Z

README.md

+``` python
+import jax.numpy as jnp
+import jaxsim.api as js
+import icub_models
+import pathlib
+
+# Load the iCub model
+model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")
+joints = ('torso_pitch', 'torso_roll', 'torso_yaw', 'l_shoulder_pitch',
+          'l_shoulder_roll', 'l_shoulder_yaw', 'l_elbow', 'r_shoulder_pitch',
+          'r_shoulder_roll', 'r_shoulder_yaw', 'r_elbow', 'l_hip_pitch',
+          'l_hip_roll', 'l_hip_yaw', 'l_knee', 'l_ankle_pitch', 'l_ankle_roll',
+          'r_hip_pitch', 'r_hip_roll', 'r_hip_yaw', 'r_knee', 'r_ankle_pitch',
+          'r_ankle_roll')
+
+# Build and reduce the model
+model_description = pathlib.Path(model_path)
+full_model = js.model.JaxSimModel.build_from_model_description(
+    model_description=model_description, time_step=0.0001, is_urdf=True
+)
+model = js.model.reduce(model=full_model, considered_joints=joints)
+
+# Initialize model data
+data = js.data.JaxSimModelData.zero(model=model).reset_base_position(
+    base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0])
+)
+
+# Frame and dynamics computations
+frame_index = js.frame.name_to_idx(model=model, frame_name="l_foot")
+W_H_F = js.frame.transform(model=model, data=data, frame_index=frame_index)  # Frame transformation
+W_J_F = js.frame.jacobian(model=model, data=data, frame_index=frame_index)  # Frame Jacobian
+
+# Dynamics properties
+M = js.model.free_floating_mass_matrix(model=model, data=data)  # Mass matrix
+h = js.model.free_floating_bias_forces(model=model, data=data)  # Bias forces
+g = js.model.free_floating_gravity_forces(model=model, data=data)  # Gravity forces
+C = js.model.free_floating_coriolis_matrix(model=model, data=data)  # Coriolis matrix
+
+# Print dynamics results
+print(f"M: shape={M.shape}, h: shape={h.shape}, g: shape={g.shape}, C: shape={C.shape}")


Collapsible section as above. Reformatted and used f-string syntax to print the shapes

Suggested change

``` python

import jax.numpy as jnp

import jaxsim.api as js

import icub_models

import pathlib

# Load the iCub model

model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

joints = ('torso_pitch', 'torso_roll', 'torso_yaw', 'l_shoulder_pitch',

'l_shoulder_roll', 'l_shoulder_yaw', 'l_elbow', 'r_shoulder_pitch',

'r_shoulder_roll', 'r_shoulder_yaw', 'r_elbow', 'l_hip_pitch',

'l_hip_roll', 'l_hip_yaw', 'l_knee', 'l_ankle_pitch', 'l_ankle_roll',

'r_hip_pitch', 'r_hip_roll', 'r_hip_yaw', 'r_knee', 'r_ankle_pitch',

'r_ankle_roll')

# Build and reduce the model

model_description = pathlib.Path(model_path)

full_model = js.model.JaxSimModel.build_from_model_description(

model_description=model_description, time_step=0.0001, is_urdf=True

)

model = js.model.reduce(model=full_model, considered_joints=joints)

# Initialize model data

data = js.data.JaxSimModelData.zero(model=model).reset_base_position(

base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0])

)

# Frame and dynamics computations

frame_index = js.frame.name_to_idx(model=model, frame_name="l_foot")

W_H_F = js.frame.transform(model=model, data=data, frame_index=frame_index) # Frame transformation

W_J_F = js.frame.jacobian(model=model, data=data, frame_index=frame_index) # Frame Jacobian

# Dynamics properties

M = js.model.free_floating_mass_matrix(model=model, data=data) # Mass matrix

h = js.model.free_floating_bias_forces(model=model, data=data) # Bias forces

g = js.model.free_floating_gravity_forces(model=model, data=data) # Gravity forces

C = js.model.free_floating_coriolis_matrix(model=model, data=data) # Coriolis matrix

# Print dynamics results

print(f"M: shape={M.shape}, h: shape={h.shape}, g: shape={g.shape}, C: shape={C.shape}")

<details>

<summary><b>Using JaxSim as a multibody dynamics library</b></summary>

``` python

import jax.numpy as jnp

import jaxsim.api as js

import icub_models

import pathlib

# Load the iCub model.

model_path = icub_models.get_model_file("iCubGazeboV2_5")

joints = ('torso_pitch', 'torso_roll', 'torso_yaw', 'l_shoulder_pitch',

'l_shoulder_roll', 'l_shoulder_yaw', 'l_elbow', 'r_shoulder_pitch',

'r_shoulder_roll', 'r_shoulder_yaw', 'r_elbow', 'l_hip_pitch',

'l_hip_roll', 'l_hip_yaw', 'l_knee', 'l_ankle_pitch', 'l_ankle_roll',

'r_hip_pitch', 'r_hip_roll', 'r_hip_yaw', 'r_knee', 'r_ankle_pitch',

'r_ankle_roll')

# Build and reduce the model.

model_description = pathlib.Path(model_path)

full_model = js.model.JaxSimModel.build_from_model_description(

model_description=model_description, time_step=0.0001, is_urdf=True

)

model = js.model.reduce(model=full_model, considered_joints=joints)

# Initialize model data.

data = js.data.JaxSimModelData.zero(model=model).reset_base_position(

base_position=jnp.array([0.0, 0.0, 1.0])

)

# Frame and dynamics computations.

frame_index = js.frame.name_to_idx(model=model, frame_name="l_foot")

W_H_F = js.frame.transform(model=model, data=data, frame_index=frame_index) # Frame transformation

W_J_F = js.frame.jacobian(model=model, data=data, frame_index=frame_index) # Frame Jacobian

# Dynamics properties.

M = js.model.free_floating_mass_matrix(model=model, data=data) # Mass matrix

h = js.model.free_floating_bias_forces(model=model, data=data) # Bias forces

g = js.model.free_floating_gravity_forces(model=model, data=data) # Gravity forces

C = js.model.free_floating_coriolis_matrix(model=model, data=data) # Coriolis matrix

# Print dynamics results.

print(f"{M.shape=} \t {h.shape=} \t {g.shape=} \t {C.shape=}")

```

same comments above about the collapse

examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb

traversaro · 2024-12-10T10:16:30Z

Use a different robot, e.g. stickbot --> not the most exciting model, but it does its job

Stickbot is nice as it is a self-contained URDF. I think there is also some value in showing to users how to load a physical URDF. My assumption is that most users will want to use the simulator with their own model for which they either have the absolute file path or the relocatable package://package/name/of/the/mode.urdf . In that case, use any Python helper such as icub-models or robot_descriptions obfuscate a bit that workflow for users.

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

CarlottaSartore · 2024-12-16T14:57:55Z

Concerning the usage of model descriptor, I would stay with the icub models dependency. even though it introduces a new dependencies it shows how:

simply load a humanoid robot
simply load ergoCub robot
does not lead to strange models (as ergoCUb gazebo)
is a real humanoid robots with meshes (unlike stickbot )

xela-95

Thanks @CarlottaSartore ! It LGTM! I will update the title of the examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb notebook since up to now it's the same of the non advanced one :)

README.md

Co-authored-by: Alessandro Croci <57228872+xela-95@users.noreply.github.com>

CarlottaSartore · 2024-12-17T08:41:29Z

Thanks @CarlottaSartore ! It LGTM! I will update the title of the examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb notebook since up to now it's the same of the non advanced one :)

Thanks @xela-95 you're right! I have also updated the example readme with the new example !

added advanced and basic example for jaxsim simulator, added usage se…

df4de72

…ction in readme

CarlottaSartore requested review from flferretti and xela-95 as code owners December 9, 2024 14:51

CarlottaSartore requested a review from traversaro December 9, 2024 14:52

CarlottaSartore self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024

traversaro approved these changes Dec 9, 2024

View reviewed changes

added icub-models as test dependencies

243a00b

removed useless part in the notebook

10be65f

decreased batch size to allow execution in notebook

56fcf7b

flferretti requested changes Dec 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

CarlottaSartore and others added 6 commits December 16, 2024 15:51

Update examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

7ba0101

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

Update examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb

55f4a42

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

Update examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

34d64c9

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

Update examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

4f0ceb4

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

Update examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine.ipynb

98c1e03

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

Update examples/jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb

a153b2e

Co-authored-by: Filippo Luca Ferretti <102977828+flferretti@users.noreply.github.com>

xela-95 approved these changes Dec 16, 2024

View reviewed changes

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

CarlottaSartore and others added 3 commits December 17, 2024 09:35

Update README.md

0501bfb

Co-authored-by: Alessandro Croci <57228872+xela-95@users.noreply.github.com>

Update jaxsim_as_physics_engine_advanced.ipynb

98c4a26

Update example readme

f32f91d

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Added usage section in ReadMe and basic example for simulator #314

Added usage section in ReadMe and basic example for simulator #314

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti left a comment

flferretti Dec 10, 2024

CarlottaSartore Dec 16, 2024

flferretti Dec 17, 2024

flferretti Dec 10, 2024

CarlottaSartore Dec 16, 2024

flferretti Dec 10, 2024

CarlottaSartore Dec 16, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 10, 2024

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 16, 2024

xela-95 left a comment

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 17, 2024

Added usage section in ReadMe and basic example for simulator #314

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Added usage section in ReadMe and basic example for simulator #314

Conversation

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024

flferretti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flferretti Dec 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CarlottaSartore Dec 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flferretti Dec 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flferretti Dec 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CarlottaSartore Dec 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flferretti Dec 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CarlottaSartore Dec 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

traversaro commented Dec 10, 2024

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 16, 2024

xela-95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 17, 2024

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

flferretti commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

traversaro commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

CarlottaSartore commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading