Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimal Sizing: 50% draft #90

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

samgdotson
Copy link
Collaborator

@samgdotson samgdotson commented Jul 27, 2020

Closes #89 by adding a 50% draft for the Optimal Sizing paper.

A built version of it is contained in main.pdf.

@samgdotson samgdotson added Comp:Analysis This issue has to do with the analysis component of the code or document. (plots, postprocessing) Difficulty:2-Challenging This issue may be complex or require specialized skills. Priority:2-Normal This work is important and should be completed ASAP. Status:5-In Review This issue has been handled, and the solution is being reviewed. (probably as a PR) Type:Feature New feature or feature request labels Jul 27, 2020
@samgdotson samgdotson self-assigned this Jul 27, 2020
@samgdotson samgdotson requested a review from Dayvis7 July 27, 2020 22:24
@Dayvis7
Copy link

Dayvis7 commented Jul 29, 2020

has the paper been edited/gone through the writing checklist? do you want us to look at the paper or the code?

@samgdotson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The paper, don't worry about the latex code.

@katyhuff
Copy link
Member

Thanks @samgdotson .
I'll aim to take a look when the writing has been reviewed. Thanks @Dayvis7 !
I can't promise much action in the next two weeks, but will do my best.

@Dayvis7
Copy link

Dayvis7 commented Jul 31, 2020

@samgdotson I emailed you my edit for the paper.

@katyhuff katyhuff removed their request for review August 17, 2020 19:16
the life cycle carbon emissions of a nuclear power plant is rivaled only by on-
shore wind power, shown in Figure \ref{fig:co2sources} and is capable of
Nuclear energy was conspicuously absent from the Master Plan's analysis.
The life cycle carbon emissions of a nuclear power plant is rivaled only by on-
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'is rivaled only' is passive voice.
Can you use active voice?

producing the high temperature steam required for district heating at
\gls{uiuc} \cite{allen_framing_2018}. These two facts alone make nuclear power
an ideal candidate for replacing the coal and natural gas boilers in the campus
power plant. Additionally, criticisms about nuclear's lack of profitability
would not apply to nuclear power at \gls{uiuc} because the campus operates a
micro-grid and is thus uninfluenced by the deregulated energy market in
micro-grid and is thus insulated from the deregulated energy market in
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'is insulated from' is passive voice
Can you use active voice?

Copy link
Contributor

@robfairh robfairh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left a few comments.
It looks good regardless.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Comp:Analysis This issue has to do with the analysis component of the code or document. (plots, postprocessing) Difficulty:2-Challenging This issue may be complex or require specialized skills. Priority:2-Normal This work is important and should be completed ASAP. Status:5-In Review This issue has been handled, and the solution is being reviewed. (probably as a PR) Type:Feature New feature or feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a 50% draft of the Optimal Sizing paper
4 participants