You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Investigate the possibility of using short-lived connections instead of the current connection-less approach to support the proof-request mechanism for VC-AuthN.
A short-lived connection is a "normal" connection that is established with a goal code specifying that it will be severed once the purpose it was created for is achieved. As an example, I could create a connection with the purpose of completing a proof-request, use that connection to submit the proof-request to the holder and delete that connection once done.
A couple of caveats to consider:
success/failure scenarios need to be considered. In particular, in case of failure a problem report should be delivered on the connection before it is deleted.
experience could be clunky if the holder does not know what to expect: connections remaining in their wallet beyond the initial purpose, problem reports not arriving (see above), maybe more
Investigate the possibility of using short-lived connections instead of the current connection-less approach to support the proof-request mechanism for VC-AuthN.
A short-lived connection is a "normal" connection that is established with a goal code specifying that it will be severed once the purpose it was created for is achieved. As an example, I could create a connection with the purpose of completing a proof-request, use that connection to submit the proof-request to the holder and delete that connection once done.
A couple of caveats to consider:
Relates to #203
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: