Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revamp governance and others #38

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Revamp governance and others #38

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

veitveit
Copy link
Member

Several adjustments and correction to represent the current setup and governance.

@hmenager @magnuspalmblad @matuskalas
Please take a look at the changes in the governance and contributors. I tried to keep things simple and changes minimal.

I also removed the thematic editors from the governance, but still kept a now less concise page for a the thematic editors

@anitamnd
FYI

@magnuspalmblad
Copy link

magnuspalmblad commented Dec 19, 2024 via email

@veitveit
Copy link
Member Author

Done 👍

Copy link
Member

@hmenager hmenager left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm done. I have a few comments (see review details), but these changes are very welcome, thanks a lot @veitveit !

code.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contributors.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
curators_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

If you cannot find the right term, request it’s added to EDAM via `GitHub <https://github.com/edamontology/edamontology/issues/new>`_ but first read the guidelines on `how to request a term <http://edamontologydocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributors_guide.html#requests>`_.

.. note::
It currently takes some time from requesting new EDAM terms for these to be supported in *bio.tools*. In future, you'll be able to request terms directly via the *bio.tools* registration interface and these terms will become immediately available for use, albeit subject to approval and possible change before inclusion in EDAM and *bio.tools*.

.. note::
Some high-level "organisational" concepts defined in EDAM are intended primarily to structure the hierarchy, and are not intended for annotation in *bio.tools*. They are defined in `EDAM.owl <https://github.com/edamontology/edamontology/blob/master/EDAM_dev.owl>`_ via ``<usageGuideline>Not recommended for annotation in bio.tools.</usageGuideline>`. Such tips are visible in the OLS and BioPortal browsers.
Some high-level "organisational" concepts defined in EDAM are intended primarily to structure the hierarchy, and are not intended for annotation in *bio.tools*. They are defined in `EDAM.owl <https://github.com/edamontology/edamontology/blob/master/EDAM_dev.owl>`_ via `<usageGuideline>Not recommended for annotation in bio.tools.</usageGuideline>`. Such tips are visible in the OLS and BioPortal browsers.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be <notRecommendedForAnnotation rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean">true</notRecommendedForAnnotation>. And might need some validation from @matuskalas.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I changed that now.

editors_guide.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
studentships.rst Outdated
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
bio.tools Studentships
======================

`ELIXIR Denmark <http://elixir-node.cbs.dtu.dk/>`_ - the coordinating node of the *bio.tools* project - earmars funds (as available) to support studentships to work on curation-focussed mini-projects for *bio.tools*. Projects must have clear and quantifiable impact on *bio.tools* content, in terms of number of entries and / or content quality. Projects can include developments of some tooling, so long as this contributes directly to the project goals.
`ELIXIR Denmark <http://elixir-denmark.org/>`_ - the coordinating node of the *bio.tools* project - earmars funds (as available) to support studentships to work on curation-focussed mini-projects for *bio.tools*. Projects must have clear and quantifiable impact on *bio.tools* content, in terms of number of entries and / or content quality. Projects can include developments of some tooling, so long as this contributes directly to the project goals.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are such studentships still funded by ELIXIR-DK? Also, typo with a missing k on earmarks.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes and no. Mostly repurposed funding from either local or ELIXIR resources. Until now the students have been supervised by Jon, Hans and I. Therefore the ELIXIR-DK tag.

Or am I wrong here?

studentships.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants