Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Qodana update #72

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 2, 2024
Merged

ci: Qodana update #72

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 2, 2024

Conversation

brenoepics
Copy link
Owner

@brenoepics brenoepics commented Mar 2, 2024

Description of Problem

Proposed Solution

Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the continuous integration workflow to enhance code quality checks.
      • Setup for JDK 17 added.
      • Maven packages caching implemented.
      • Build and analyze step introduced for better insight.
      • Coverage data archiving added for future reference.
      • Qodana Scan step enhanced with new parameters and version update.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Walkthrough

This update improves the project's development environment and code quality assurance by enhancing the GitHub Actions workflow. Key enhancements include setting up a newer Java Development Kit, optimizing dependencies management through Maven caching, refining the code analysis process with updated Qodana Scan configurations, and ensuring thorough documentation of code coverage. These changes aim to streamline development workflows, improve build efficiency, and maintain high code quality standards.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/... - Set up JDK 17
- Cached Maven packages
- Updated Qodana Scan step and parameters
- Added build and analysis step
- Archived coverage data

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where rabbits dare,
We hop through workflows with utmost care.
With JDK set, and caches aligned,
Our code now gleams, no flaw to find.
A scan, a build, all neatly done,
In GitHub Actions, our victory won.
🌟📚

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@brenoepics brenoepics merged commit 4e19ffa into main Mar 2, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07239c7 and 77217c8.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • qodana.yaml is excluded by: !**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/qodana.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
.github/workflows/qodana.yml (5)
  • 19-23: The step to set up JDK 17 is correctly implemented using actions/setup-java@v3. This ensures that the Java Development Kit version is aligned with the project's requirements or the Qodana analyzer's compatibility needs. However, it's important to verify that JDK 17 is compatible with all other steps in the workflow and the project's codebase.
  • 24-29: The caching step for Maven packages is well-implemented, using actions/cache@v3. This step will likely reduce build times by reusing the packages across workflow runs. It's crucial to ensure that the key and restore-keys are correctly configured to maximize cache hits. The use of hashFiles('**/pom.xml') for the cache key is a good practice as it ensures the cache is invalidated when dependencies change.
  • 30-33: The "Build and analyze" step is correctly configured to run Maven's clean verify goal with the coverage profile. This integrates the build and analysis process, which is a significant improvement. However, ensure that the coverage profile is correctly set up in the project's pom.xml to generate the necessary coverage data.
  • 34-38: The step to archive coverage data using actions/upload-artifact@v2 is correctly implemented. It's important to ensure that the path specified (target/site/jacoco) matches the directory where the coverage data is generated by the Maven build. This step is crucial for maintaining historical data on code coverage.
  • 39-44: The updated Qodana Scan step now includes new parameters and a version update, which is a positive change. However, it's important to ensure that the specified arguments (-i,JVM/jacoco/maven,--linter,jetbrains/qodana-jvm:2023.3-eap) are correct and compatible with the project. The use of an EAP (Early Access Program) version (2023.3-eap) should be carefully considered, as EAP versions might include unfinished features or bugs.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant