Skip to content

cbbrowne/pgcmp

Repository files navigation

pgcmp

Purpose

This toolset is intended to perform comparisons (“reconciliation”) of schemas between databases to determine if they are equivalent. There are several contexts where this is useful, each with a somewhat different understanding of equivalent.

  1. Build process
    • The build process has database schema in two forms:
      Build From Scratch
      A deployable database is built from scratch, from an empty database
      Upgrade From Earlier Version
      An older version is upgraded to the latest version using a set of upgrade scripts.
    • We need to ensure that the results of building from scratch are identical to those that come from upgrading the old version using upgrade scripts.
    • In this case, we do not expect any variations, aside from the fact that OIDs will vary between databases. These databases will be built within the same smoke test environment, and thus have the same sets of users, roles, and such, and there should not be any additional components introduced (as might be the case in production)
    • It is therefore considered a build-breaking error to find any variation between the two database schemas
  2. Validating upgrades
    • When DBAs are planning to upgrade an instance, using the upgrade scripts, it is essential that their starting point represents a schema that is equivalent to the previous version. Otherwise, if the starting point is wrong, then the upgrade scripts may not provide a proper upgrade to the new version of the schema.
    • In this environment, there are a number of acceptable kinds of differences that should be accommodated between the “production” schema and a “development” schema:
      Replication
      Development does not include replication, but in production, Slony schema, tables, functions, and such will exist, and the reconciliation should be able to exclude these differences.
      DBA Tooling
      DBAs add additional tooling into production databases, generally in their own schemas, to help with monitoring.
      Supplementary Applications
      Some applications have add-ons, and, when considering the main application, we may wish to exclude add-ons.
      Specialized Ownership
      Often, different users are used in production than are used in development.
    • As a result, when reconciling the “old” schema version against the version in production, it will be necessary to accept the need for reconciling entries so that DBAs are not left puzzling over hundreds of differences that may be reasonably expected.
  3. Validating replicas in sync
    • When deploying an upgrade, it is not sufficient to know that the “master” node has an agreeable schema; it is essential that all replicas have suitable schemas.
    • In the above analysis, it was necessary to accommodate there being considerable difference between the “development” schema and the “production” schema. When comparing replicas, differences should be considered rather more dangerous. Differences to accept/accommodate include:
      Node-specific deployment
      In some cases, add-ons are only installed on certain nodes in the cluster.
      Origin/Replica differences
      Slony defines some triggers that run only on origin nodes (e.g. - logtrigger()), and others that run only on replica nodes (e.g. - denyaccess()).

The Comparison Script

pgcmp tooling consists of pair of scripts:

This script pulls data about the schema from the two databases that are to be compared, loads that data into a third database where that data is compared in order, and performs a reconciliation of the similarities and differences.

pgcmp-dump
This tool extracts schema data from a database, putting it into a data file for later analysis
pgcmp
This tool uses a pair of files generated by pgcmp-dump, and looks for differences.

Security Considerations

This script requires read-only access to schema data in INFORMATION_SCHEMA and pg_catalog in both databases that are to be compared.

This script requires write access to a third database in which it constructs a series of tables used to perform the reconciliation.

Running pgcmp components

pgcmp-dump

pgcmp-dump uses a series of environment variables to control its activity.

  • Database connection information
    PGDB
    Database name
    PPGGHOST
    Database host
    PGUSER
    DB User
    PGPORT
    Port number
    PGPGURI
    Since PostgreSQL 9.2, libpq supports PGURIs as a singular connection string. pgcmp prefers the use of these URIs. If the individual parameters above are offered, they will be constructed into a URI; if PGURI is populated, it will be used instead.
PGCLABEL
Indicates an identifer for the database’s data to report in analysis output
PGCMPOUTPUT
The name of the file in which to store output, that is, the set of metadata about the database schema that will be used later for comparison with the schema of another database.
PGCMPIGNORESLONYTRIGGERS
defaults to false; if true, then ignore differences involving triggers of the form created by Slony-I
$ PGURI=postgresql://postgres@localhost/test1 PGCMPOUTPUT=/tmp/test-pgcmp-file1 PGCLABEL=db1 ../pgcmp-dump
pgcmp-dump - extracting schema data from database PGURI=[postgresql://postgres@localhost/test1]

Data file containing output: PGCMPOUTPUT[/tmp/test-pgcmp-file1]
Label: PGCLABEL=[db1]

Extracted schema data for postgresql://postgres@localhost/test1
-rw-r--r-- 1 cbbrowne cbbrowne 7350 Nov  3 12:12 /tmp/test-pgcmp-file1

pgcmp

pgcmp uses a pair of input files as produced by pgcmp-dump, loads them into a comparison database, and checks for differences.

It uses a series of environment variables to control its activity.

PGBINDIR
Indicates where to find psql
  • Database connection information
    PGDB
    Database name
    PPGGHOST
    Database host
    PGUSER
    DB User
    PGPORT
    Port number
    PGURI
    Since PostgreSQL 9.2, libpq supports PGURIs as a singular connection string. pgcmp prefers the use of these URIs. If the individual parameters above are offered, they will be constructed into a URI; if PGURI is populated, it will be used instead.
PGCLABEL1
Label identifying data for the first database
PGCLABEL2
Label identifying data for the second database
PGCOMITSCHEMAS
Indicates (as a SQL clause suitable to insert VALUES into a table), a set of schema labels from pg_catalog.pg_namespace that should be omitted from analysis. As identifiers, they may require doublequotes consistent with the function pg_catalog.quote_ident(). pg_catalog and information_schema were automatically left out in pgcmp-dump, so they do not need to be included.
  • Data file information
    PGCWORKDIR
    Work directory where work files are placed/found, defaults to /tmp
    PGCEXPLANATIONS
    Contains records intended to explain expected variations
    • Structure is a Postgres COPY of data for a table of expected differences, defined as follows:
create table expected_differences (
    object_type text,
    object_name text,
    difference_type text,
    difference_cause text,
    primary key(object_type, object_name, difference_type, difference_cause)
);
PGCFULLOUTPUT
Contains full output of all records, those that match and those that do not.
  • Structure is a Postgres COPY of data from a table with the following structure:
create table fulloutput (
  object_name text,
  object_type text,
  label1 text,
  object_definition1 text,
  label2 text,
  object_definition2 text,
  difference_type text,
  difference_cause text,
  importance integer
);
PGCUNEXPLAINED
Contains the set of records that did not match between schemas that did not have explanations provided.
  • Structure is a Postgres COPY of data from a table with the following structure:
create table unexplained_items (
  object_name text,
  object_schema text,
  object_type text,
  label1 text,
  id1 integer,
  object_definition1 text,
  label2 text,
  id2 integer,
  object_definition2 text,
  difference_type text,
  importance integer
);
PGCBADEXPLAIN
Contains the set of records that did not match between schemas where explanations offered did not match the problem.
  • Structure is a Postgres COPY of data from a table with the following structure:
create table badexplanations_items (
  object_type text,
  object_schema text,
  object_name text,
  difference_type text,
  difference_cause text,
  importance integer
);
PGCMPINPUT1
Input file containing metadata about the schema for the first database
PGCMPINPUT2
Input file containing metadata about the schema for the second database

Interpretations of differences

object_type
Indicates which kind of object had a difference
object_schema
Indicates the namespace where the object occurs
object_name
Fully qualified name of the object
difference_type
Kind of difference, one of
typedescription
matchperfect match across the databases
mismatchvalues differ between databases
missing in 1st DBexists in 2nd database, but not 1st one
missing in 2nd DBexists in 1st database, but not 2nd one
difference_cause
Indicates whether a difference has been explained satisfactorily via the explanations.txt data
Not Yet Properly Explained
Indicates the difference has not been explained at all
Still Not Properly Explained
Indicates that explanations.txt indicates that the problem was not explained. In effect, the administrator took the data straight out of an earlier pgcmp run, and tried to use it as an explanation, as opposed to analyzing it to determine what should be done about it.
Misexplained
Indicates that the explanation in the explanations.txt file indicated a different sort of difference_type than was found by pgcmp.
importance
Indicates how crucial a discrepancy is. Low importance values indicate the most crucial items. Generally:
NULL
no discrepancy found; no difference to be examined
1
mismatch between databases, likely indicating a problem to be fixed
2
object is present in one database, absent in the other
3 or more
object is present in one database, absent in the other, but is a “child” of some other missing object. For instance, if a schema is missing, then that would be indicated as importance=2, the tables, views, sequences, and such, in that schema that are missing in one database would be marked with importance=3, and columns, indexes, and other attributes of tables/views/sequences would be marked with importance=4. The items with importance of 3 or 4 are the consequence of the importance=2 item; the focus of an analyst should be in the high importance (1,2) items.

Input File: explanations.txt

The input file, explanations.txt, provides a set of explanation items that allow an administrator to indicate explanations for discrepancies that are considered acceptable.

For instance:

Production includes Slony
If comparing a development schema that does not include replication against a production schema where Slony has been installed, it is to be expected that all of the Slony objects will comprise a set of “expected” differences.
Production Monitoring
DBAs may add in additional components such as the pgstattuples contrib module, or even additional schemas and tables.
Production Users
The production environment may be expected to have additional users and roles not found in the development schema.
create table expected_differences (
    object_type text,
    object_schema text,
    object_name text,
    difference_type text,
    difference_cause text,
    importance integer,
    primary key(object_type, object_name, difference_type, difference_cause)
);
How To Populate explanations.txt

The easiest way to populate this file is by running pgcmp.sh with an empty set of explanations, and then transforming the resulting set of unexplained items into “explained” differences.

insert into expected_differences (object_type, object_schema,
object_name, difference_type, difference_cause) select object_type,
object_schema, object_name, difference_type, 'Slony objects only in
production' from unexplained_items where object_name like '_oxrspro%';

insert into expected_differences (object_type, object_schema,
object_name, difference_type, difference_cause) select object_type,
object_schema, object_name, difference_type, 'contrib objects only in
production' from unexplained_items where object_name like
'postgres_contrib%';

insert into expected_differences (object_type, object_schema,
object_name, difference_type, difference_cause) select object_type,
object_schema, object_name, difference_type, 'Conversion objects to be
removed from production' from unexplained_items where object_name like
'dotpro_conversion%';

\copy expected_differences to '/tmp/expected_differences.txt';

In subsequent runs, these differences become “expected” differences, so that a DBA or QA analyst does not need to spend their attention manually filtering out these expected differences.

Outputs

The process has output in several forms:

  • Brief report to standard output
  • Files containing details
  • Return codes useful for determining success/failure

Brief Report

Here is an example of running a comparison between two schemas:

Parameters
lists values for all the environment variables
Extraction Summary
lists information about the files of extracted schema data
SQL messages
lists commands run against the comparison database
Results Summary
indicates, by object type, statistics on matches, differences, and explanations. This is a summary on the table fulloutput.
Inadequately Explained Items
indicates specific objects that were inadequately explained by the EXPLANATIONS data

File Output

The following files (based on contents of these environment variables) are created and populated via COPY:

FULLOUTPUT
populated from table fulloutput
  • This contains a full list of all objects examined in both databases, complete with objects, respective definitions, and difference type and cause
    UNEXPLAINED
    populated from table unexplained_items
  • This lists all objects where there was some difference, but no item found to explain the difference.
    BADEXPLAIN
    populated from table badexplanations_items
  • This lists all objects where there was some difference, and an explanation, but the explanation did not properly explain the difference. For instance, an object was missing from the second database, but the explanation indicated that there should have been a different definition (which indicates that the object was expected to be found in both databases).

Return Codes

If errors are encountered, the script pgcmp.sh will terminate with varying exit codes:

exit 1
If data could not be extracted from the either of the source databases
exit 1
If a connection is not established with the comparison database
exit 2
If the comparison script does not run successfully
exit 3
If not all object differences were adequately explained
exit 0
If all runs to completion, and differences were adequately explained

Thus, generally explaining this:

  1. Comparison ran successfully, found no troublesome differences
  2. Database connectivity problems
  3. Error in processing comparison
  4. Comparison ran, and found irreconcilable differences

These return codes should be useful if running scripts to do automated schema analyses.

Installation Requirements

pgcmp is implemented as a shell script (expects to be run using /bin/bash), and thus requires:

Bash
Available as /bin/bash
psql
Available from a Postgres installation

If building an RPM file, this documentation, in README.org, is transformed to HTML using a Ruby script that uses a Ruby “gem” called org-ruby.

There are several ways the org-ruby gem may be installed:

Manual Installation of Ruby Gem
This Gem may be installed via the command gem install org-ruby. On many systems, this would need to be run by the root user, perhaps using sudo.
Packaged Installation
On Debian (and perhaps derivatives such as Ubuntu), this gem is contained by the package ruby-org, and hence may be installed via apt-get install ruby-org.

About

Tool for comparing Postgres database schemas

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published