Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

versions: Bump fedora base image to f40 #2135

Merged

Conversation

stevenhorsman
Copy link
Member

Fedora 39 is EoL in a couple of weeks and I've started seeing a few repo connection errors, so lets bump to F40 as the latest supported version.

Note

Once golang-fedora:1.22.7-39 is built, this will be followed up with
a bump of the builder_base as well.

Fedora 39 is EoL in a couple of weeks and I've started
seeing a few repo connection errors, so lets bump to F40
as the latest supported version.

> [!NOTE]
> Once `golang-fedora:1.22.7-39` is built, this will be followed up with
a bump of the builder_base as well.

Signed-off-by: stevenhorsman <steven@uk.ibm.com>
@stevenhorsman stevenhorsman requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2024 14:08
@wainersm
Copy link
Member

Hi @stevenhorsman !

peerpods-ctrl image built fine with F40 but I don't remember if we have a workflow for testing it. I was attempted to trigger the libvirt e2e CI to see if caa runtime on F40 would work with binaries built with F39, but it doesn't matter in the end as you will bump the binaries builder to F40 anyway.

Copy link
Member

@wainersm wainersm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @stevenhorsman !

@stevenhorsman
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @stevenhorsman !

peerpods-ctrl image built fine with F40 but I don't remember if we have a workflow for testing it. I was attempted to trigger the libvirt e2e CI to see if caa runtime on F40 would work with binaries built with F39, but it doesn't matter in the end as you will bump the binaries builder to F40 anyway.

Yeah - the two stage is a bit annoying, but I think it's safer for a bigger bump like this rather than slamming both halves in and potentially breaking things.

@stevenhorsman stevenhorsman merged commit b58e897 into confidential-containers:main Oct 29, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants