Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix comment #21966

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

chore: fix comment #21966

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

tianyeyouyou
Copy link
Contributor

@tianyeyouyou tianyeyouyou commented Sep 28, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated comments for clarity on function and method purposes, including:
      • NewMetrics function name clarification.
      • PrunesCmd method now specifies its role in pruning application history states.
      • Server type terminology updated for better understanding.
      • ExportSnapshotCmd method now clearly states its function in exporting application state to the snapshot store.

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 C:server/v2 api labels Sep 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to comments in several files within the server's telemetry and store components. These changes primarily focus on updating comments to accurately reflect the functions and methods they describe, ensuring clarity and alignment with the actual code implementations.

Changes

File Change Summary
server/v2/api/telemetry/metrics.go Comment updated for NewMetrics function to clarify its name.
server/v2/store/commands.go Comment updated for PrunesCmd method to specify its role in pruning application history states.
server/v2/store/server.go Comment updated for Server type to reflect the correct terminology, changing from StoreComponent.
server/v2/store/snapshot.go Comment updated for ExportSnapshotCmd method to clarify its function in exporting application state.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: fix function comments #21814: The main PR and this retrieved PR both involve modifications to comments associated with functions, specifically clarifying the function names in the comments to align with their actual implementations.

Suggested reviewers

  • alpe
  • aaronc
  • lucaslopezf
  • facundomedica
  • akhilkumarpilli
  • cool-develope
  • testinginprod
  • sontrinh16
  • julienrbrt

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fe95fc and d12518e.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • server/v2/api/telemetry/metrics.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/store/commands.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/store/server.go (1 hunks)
  • server/v2/store/snapshot.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • server/v2/api/telemetry/metrics.go
  • server/v2/store/server.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
server/v2/store/commands.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

server/v2/store/snapshot.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
server/v2/store/commands.go (1)

19-19: Excellent update to the method comment.

The revised comment accurately reflects the method's name and functionality. This change enhances code clarity and maintainability, aligning well with the Uber Golang style guide.

server/v2/store/snapshot.go (1)

27-27: LGTM! Comment accurately describes the function's purpose.

The updated comment is a significant improvement:

  1. It correctly describes the ExportSnapshotCmd function's purpose.
  2. It follows the Uber Golang style guide for comments.
  3. It fixes what appears to have been a copy-paste error in the previous comment.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit dd9e582 Sep 28, 2024
71 of 78 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 api C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants